Showing posts with label Vocation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vocation. Show all posts

Sunday, 5 February 2017

The vocation and mission of Jesus

Why did Jesus came on earth? What did he came to do?

To proclaim the Kingdom of God[1]
l   The biblical evidence is clear:
n   proclaiming the good news… “The time has come,” he said. “The kingdom of God has come near. Repent and believe the good news!” (Mark 1:14-15). Jesus replied, “Let us go somewhere else—to the nearby villages—so I can preach there also. That is why I have come.” So he travelled throughout Galilee, preaching in their synagogues and driving out demons. (Mark 1:38-39)
n   …to proclaim good news… (Luke 4:18-19). “But He [Jesus] said to them, "I must preach the kingdom of God to the other cities also, for I was sent for this purpose” (Luke 4:43). 
n   “And Jesus was going about in all Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, and proclaiming the gospel of the kingdom, and healing every kind of disease and every kind of sickness among the people” (Matt. 4:23).
l   Most scholars would agree that a central feature of Jesus’ ministry was the kingdom of God.[2],[3] But there is little if any agreement about what the Kingdom is or how it should be defined.[4]
l   There are ways in which Jesus sees the kingdom of God as already present: ‘the time is fulfilled’ (Mark 1:15).
l   Jesus tells parables which stress the hidden, yet present, dynamic growth of the kingdom (Matthew 13:1-46).[5]
l   The kingdom of God is described in terms which put it in the future: ‘Your kingdom come’ (Matthew 6:10).[6]
l   Overthrowing the enemy:
n   Jesus relates the overthrow of demonic powers, seen in the exorcisms he performed, to the presence of the kingdom (Matthew 12:28).[7]
n   It appears Jesus understood the kingdom of God as a powerful demonstration of the rule of God, in line with the Old Testament expectation of his coming to deliver the people.[8] His experience as an infant bears striking resemblance to that of Moses; he is a greater Moses leading his people to deliverance.[9]
n   Jesus has a definite way of overthrowing the enemy in the fulfilment of time: His refusal to defend himself, on the cross, his death. God’s Kingdom rule was established at creation; It was attacked by Satan at the fall; now it is being restored on earth through the life and ministry of Jesus Christ who defeats Satan, death, and sin![10]
l   Preaching good news to the poor:
n   ‘…the poor (in spirit)… shall inherit the kingdom of God’.
n   Latin American liberation theology claim that there is preferential love by God for the poor. So the beatitudes are popular with liberation theologians. On the other hand, traditional theology has been seen to bolster social injustice because of its refusal to address critically social and economic problems. Therefore, the positive attraction of Marxist theory to combat these problems is obvious.[11]
n   The inauguration of social structures that promote the prophetic vision of justice and restore the shalom of God's people fundamentally expresses God's kingship.[12]
n   However, if the signs of God’s rule/kingdom only primarily lie only in feeding the poor, eliminating the wrong systems etc., then the cross was not necessary and we only need the socialists. Building orphanages, etc. are important. But most important is the reality of the cross and resurrection. Wherever Christians are is God’s rule. Wherever Christians are suffering and kept in faith, God’s rule is there.
l   Miracles: Jesus gave radically new meaning to the ‘language’ of the miracles: they are signs of the kingdom, signs of what God wants to do and is already doing in humankind in Jesus.[13] The miracles include exorcisms, healings, raising the dead and nature miracles, which are intended to reveal the presence and power of the kingdom.[14]
n   The miracles of healing and deliverance which Jesus did, and which the apostles performed in his name, were the apex of the biblical pattern of witnessing to the salvation of God.[15]
n   There is sovereignty in healing: He did not heal everyone. He delivered only one of many at the pool of Bethesda (John 5:1).
n   There exists a frequent connection between healings and faith, but this is not uniform. There is also a connection between healing and forgiveness, but this is not uniform.
n   The miracles are primarily signs, which point us not to themselves but to something else: the signs of the kingdom of God, Jesus’ own messianic credentials, and the fulfilment of the age of preparation.[16]  
n   Miracles did not of themselves bring about a great surge of faith. Jesus taught that if people did not believe the OT Scriptures, the greatest of all miracles would not persuade them to change (Luke 16:31 The Rich Man and Lazarus).[17]
l   The kingdom of God is the reign of God, inaugurated with the coming of Christ, but not fully consummated until his return at the end of the world.[18] The Kingdom of God involves two great moments: fulfilment within history [already], and consummation at the end of history [not yet].[19]

To seek and to save the lost
l   The lost sheep of the house of Israel:
n   “For the Son of Man came to seek and to save the lost.” (Luke 19:10).
n   …sheep without a shepherd. (Matt 9:36 Workers are Few) …lost sheep of Israel. (Matthew 10:6 Jesus sends out the 12)
l   ‘I will build my church’ (Matthew 16:18 Peter’s confession of Christ)
n   The church is, in one sense, Christ’s storm troopers, spearheading the progress of the kingdom.
n   It is important to note that although the kingdom of God includes the church as a central component, the kingdom is extensive over the entire cosmos.[20]
l   God’s rule has broken into human history to deliver men and women from the power of sin, death, and Satan. From start to finish, Jesus’ entire life and ministry was the expression of God’s mighty rule that had broken into history to deliver the creation and its human inhabitants from the curse of sin and death.[21]

To bring about God’s judgement on sin
l   …baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. (Luke 3:16-17 John the Baptist Prepares the Way)
l   Division (Luke12:49-51 No Peace but Division): The Gospel, which is as fire, that gives both light and heat, warms the hearts of God's people, and causes them to burn within them; though very distressing and torturing to wicked men; so the word of God is compared to fire. Or else zeal for it, and which would be opposed with sharp contentions by others; or rather persecution for the sake of the Gospel, called sometimes the fiery trial; which tries men, as gold is tried in the fire.[22]
l   Jesus weeps for the destruction of Jerusalem (Luke 19:41-44 The Triumphal Entry).

To give his life
l   Jesus tells his disciples privately about his forthcoming death and resurrection, but they fail to grasp its significance, because the meaning was hidden from them (Mark 8:33; Luke 18:31-34). It was not something intended for public consumption.[23]
l   Jesus affirmed the eternal validity of the law, stating that not even the smallest letter would disappear from it (Matthew 5:18-20). Jesus emphasized the true essence and purpose of the law, and his role as the fulfilment of the law.[24]
l   Christ died for our sins. Buried, raised, appeared. (1 Cor 15:1-8 The Resurrection of Christ).
l   For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many. (Mark 10:45 The Request of James and John). By becoming “a ransom for many” through his sacrificial death, Christians are under the new covenant, God’s righteous standards are now written on their hearts, not on tablets of stone.[25]
l   On the cross, God in Christ conquered sin, defeated death, and triumphed over Satan. Jesus is Christus Victor! By means of this victory, we are restored to God and our true purposes as human beings. It is the mystery of the Kingdom that makes us new creatures in Christ.[26]
l   Augustine explains the goal of the “sendings” of the Son and Spirit is to restore fallen humans into a relationship of communion with God.

References:

Chouinard, Larry. “The kingdom of God and the pursuit of justice in Matthew”, Restoration Quarterly, 45 (2003): 229-242

Chung, Miyon. “The Incarnation and Mission of Christ (Part 1).” Lecture Notes, Morling College, September 6, 2016.

Bible study tools. “John Gill's Exposition of the Bible”, Accessed November 3, 2016. http://www.biblestudytools.com/commentaries/gills-exposition-of-the-bible/

Hendrickx, Herman. The miracle stories of the synoptic gospels. London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1987.

Letham, Robert. The Work of Christ. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 1993.

Naugle, David. “Jesus Christ and the Kingdom of God.” Christian Worldview Journal. Accessed November 3, 2016. http://www.colsoncenter.org/the-center/columns/indepth/15062-jesus-christ-and-the-kingdom-of-god

Strauss, Mark. Four Portraits, One Jesus. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2007.



[1] Chung, “The Incarnation and Mission of Christ”
[2] Letham, The Work of Christ, 57.
[3] “Jesus Christ and the Kingdom of God.”
[4] “Jesus Christ and the Kingdom of God.”
[5] Letham, The Work of Christ, 59.
[6] Letham, The Work of Christ, 60.
[7] Letham, The Work of Christ, 59.
[8] Letham, The Work of Christ, 60.
[9] Letham, The Work of Christ, 61.
[10] “Jesus Christ and the Kingdom of God.”
[11] Letham, The Work of Christ, 62-63.
[12]Chouinard, “The kingdom of God,” 236.
[13]Herman Hendrickx, The miracle stories of the synoptic gospels (London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1987), 11. Nowadays people speak of miracles in terms of a ‘violation of the laws of nature’. The more important this ‘violation’, the greater the miracle. But Jesus and his contemporaries would not have understood this way of thinking and speaking. They were not familiar with our concept of ‘laws of nature’. In a biblical perspective, therefore, one cannot speak of a miracle as a ‘violation of nature’.
[14]Strauss, Four Portraits, 461-465. 
[15] Letham, The Work of Christ, 68.
[16] Letham, The Work of Christ, 69.
[17] Letham, The Work of Christ, 70.
[18] Letham, The Work of Christ, 62.
[19] “Jesus Christ and the Kingdom of God.”
[20] Letham, The Work of Christ, 74.
[21] “Jesus Christ and the Kingdom of God.”
[22] “John Gill's Exposition of the Bible”
[23] Letham, The Work of Christ, 71.
[24]Strauss, Four Portraits, 441. 
[25]Strauss, Four Portraits, 444. 
[26] “Jesus Christ and the Kingdom of God.”

Wednesday, 23 September 2015

From repentance to hope


(notes taken from Donald Capps’ two books: 1) Agents of Hope and 2) Pastoral Care: A thematic approach.)

There are three attitudes where, once internalised and well established, poses a powerful threat to the maintenance of a hopeful attitude toward life: despair, apathy and shame.[1]

Despair is the perception that what is wanted will not happen, the sense that what is realisable for others is not realisable for me, in spite of the fact that I very much desire it.[2] It essentially takes two forms: It may be projected outward in the form of disgust directed against other persons or institutions, or it may be deeply internalised in the form of depression. What makes it so difficult to combat is that it feeds on itself in a downward spiral of hopelessness. It involves the perception that the future, already narrowed, is foreshortened, either because it is too late to start over, or because the future is blocked.[3] In despair, we place a great deal of blame on ourselves for the failure of our hopes to materialise. It is our deficiency, the inadequacy of our own skills and abilities, which is primarily responsible for the frustration of our hopes.[4] It is only when one recognises the grace of God that our hopes are kept alive.[5]

Apathy is the state of desirelessness together with a strong element of “not caring” about what is happening around us, to us, or within us.[6] Humans are by nature desiring beings since we are always experiencing the presence of an absence. Apathy is a condition that is the very antithesis of human nature.[7] It sees no meaningful connection between short-term activities and long-term goals, eg. I will become my father’s successor as the CEO of the family business when he eventually retires.[8] The sociopathic personality is one who have no realisable hopes beyond the most immediate present. Even short-term desires are difficult to entertain because there are no long-term aspirations or desires to which these more immediate desires are related. The sociopath, beginning in childhood, has never had much hope for the long-term future and is therefore “geared primarily to getting immediate gratification in the present and near future.”[9] Boredom and indifference are characteristics of apathy, because they have ceased to love: no love for the other, no love for self, and no love for the world of nearly infinite possibility. Perhaps the only way for apathetic selves to find hope again is to rekindle the fires of love that have long since been extinguished, for love is the ultimate source of all desire.[10]

Shame is the painful realisation that events have in fact turned out very differently from what was hoped for and confidently expected. Another words, we have made a serious misprojection of ourselves.[11] In fact, the pain of realising that we have been wrong, stupid, or naïve, that we have assumed too much, is usually considered punishment enough. And we may have invested a lot in these hoped-for outcomes.[12]

In summary, the three major threats to the maintenance of a hopeful attitude in life. Despair occurs when we have reason to believe that what we desire so much to come about is not likely to occur after all. Apathy occurs when we no longer invest desire in anything that is happening to us, and it usually results from the fact that the future is already determined. Shame occurs when what we confidently expected to happen does not occur and we are faced with the painful realisation that we put our trust and confidence in a reality that was not there.[13] What is so devastating about these threats to hope is not only that it makes us more reluctant to entertain specific hopes, but that we allow them to affect our basic sense of who we are, our very selfhood. The capacity to hope is the core of human selfhood, and this is why despair, apathy, and shame are so destructive of the human self.[14]

Three attitudes that undergird hope are trust, patience, and modesty.

The general meaning of trust is a confident expectation, anticipation, or hope for the future. Another more specific meaning is a firm belief or confidence in the honest, integrity, relationship, or justice of another person or thing.[15] It is like the “general state of trust” found among infants where they have learned to rely on the sameness and continuity of the outer providers.[16] Another meaning of trust involves the act of entrusting something of value to us into the hand of another person or institution, eg. entrusting our children to the care of teachers and schools. We have relinquished control over the fate or future of what is of value to us by entrusting it to the care of the other. Entrusting is a voluntary act.[17] Fear is the experience that threatens our natural disposition to trust and our willingness to entrust ourselves and that is dear to us to another. The source of fear can be outside of us as the world is not a uniformly safe place to be. It may also be due to the fact that persons on whom we must rely are unreliable or even abusive.[18] In order to hope, we must have the experience of trust.[19]

Patience is concerned with keeping hopes alive. It is the will or ability to wait or endure without complaint; and it is steadiness, endurance, or perseverance in performing a task. One is to wait in an uncomplaining manner, accepting and serene. Patience is what we develop by engaging in difficult tasks without giving up: steadiness, endurance, perseverance.[20] Frustration is the experience that creates the need for patients. Basic to apathy is the experience of frustration and patience is the human capacity to enable us to endure it. Patience is the assurance that the hoped-for outcome is worth the frustration and therefore keeps us steadfast in our hope.[21] As patience develops into an enduring attitude, it, in turn, enables us to keep our sense of frustration at manageable levels so that we do not abandon our hopes.[22]

Modesty the avoidance of excesses or extremes, whereby we remain situated within the real world and do not try to distance ourselves from it. It is a self-referential statement about ourselves where in hoping, we try to avoid the self-deception that occurs when we take leave of the real world and enter a fantasy world.[23] It is an appropriate reaction to the failure of hope to materialise and a positive alternative to shame. By recognising our place in the world and accepting the fact that our hopes are vulnerable to events and circumstances beyond our power to control, an attitude of modesty regarding ourselves can emerge which fortifies us against shame. Our power to influence and control events is necessarily limited, as we are not omniscient beings who are able to anticipate everything that may or may not happen in the future, and we will continue to hope in spite of this knowledge.[24]

Because we trust, we are able to exercise greater patience. Because our attitude is one of modesty, we are conscious of the necessity of trust. These, then, are not discrete virtues, but a system of dispositions that support and enhance one another. Most importantly, the three of them together assume a life of their own and sustain the hopeful self even as specific hopes may go unrealised.[25]

The meaning any event has for us depends upon the frame in which we perceive it. When we change the frame, we change the meaning. Reframing is changing the frame in which a person perceives events in order to change the meaning. When the meaning changes, the person’s responses and behaviours also change. There are two reframing methods in which pastors may use to encourage hopefulness. One is the method of envisioning the future, the other is the method of revising the past. The first method encourages us to take a future persepective on the present. The second invites us to locate our past with a new frame, thereby revising the meaning it has held for us, and thus “changing” the past from a basis for hopelessness into a basis and resource for hopefulness.[26] Revisiting and rebiographing it is one way of reframing. One possible meaning of repentance is that one’s sinful past is blotted out, like an erased debt. Another is that one’s sinful past is rectified. The story of Joseph is a biblical example of rebiographing[27], whereby he turned his brothers’ act of betrayal into a “useful event for humanity”, a viable method of reframing because it is grounded in the boundless mercy of God, who is able to take sinful actions that we or others committed in the past and make them something better than we would ever have imagined. Therefore, rebiographing makes the past as open and possibility-filled as the future.[28]


Theological themes in pastoral counselling:
l   Providence: trust vs. mistrust. The theological theme focuses on the counselee’s sense that the world is under God’s guidance and therefore trustworthy. The psychosocial theme concerns the counselee’s sense of being able to rely on the sameness and continuity of other providers.
l   Grace or gratefulness: autonomy vs. shame and self-doubt. The theological theme recognises that the counselee often rejects the kindness and generosity of others[29] because he has an excessive sense of his own unworthiness. The psychological theme focuses on the counselee’s capacity to appropriate the goodwill of others when he is not overcome with feelings of shame and self-doubt.
l   Repentance: Initiative vs. guilt. The theological theme focuses on the counselee’s acceptance of an appropriate level of moral responsibility for his situation. The psychosocial theme focuses on the counselee’s capacity not to allow himself to become immobilised by guilt on the one hand or to display excessive self-righteousness on the other.
l   Vocation: industry vs. inferiority. The theological theme focuses on the counselee’s sense of purpose, dedication, personal competence and effectiveness.[30] The psychosocial theme centres on the counselee’s capacity to participate in a productive situation and bring it to completion.
l   Faith: identity vs identity diffusion. The theological theme focuses on the counselee’s affirmative attitude toward life; his religious proclivities as widening his scope of engagement. The psychosocial theme centres on the counselee’s desire to affirm and be affirmed by others; it manifests itself in a concern to integrate one’s experiences to date into a widening radius of psychosocial commitments and expressions of fidelity.
l   Communion: intimacy vs. isolation. The theological theme focuses on the counselee’s sense of being accepted into social groups that matter to him. The psychosocial theme focuses on the counselee’s capacity to commit himself to concrete affiliations, even though they may call for significant sacrifices and compromises.
l   Vocation: generativity vs. stagnation. The theological theme focuses on the counselee’s sense of purpose, dedication, personal competence, and effectiveness. The psychosocial theme centres on the counselee’s capacity to play a productive role on behalf of other people, especially the younger generation.
l   Awareness of the holy: integrity vs. despair. The theological theme focuses on the counselee’s relationship to powers or forces beyond himself. The psychosocial theme centres on his sense of comradeship with the cultural forces that have shaped his life.[31]




[1] Donald Capps, Agents of Hope: A pastoral psychology (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1995), 98.
[2] Capps, Agents of Hope, 99.
[3] Capps, Agents of Hope, 105.
[4] Capps, Agents of Hope, 105.
[5] Capps, Agents of Hope, 107.
[6] Capps, Agents of Hope, 107.
[7] Capps, Agents of Hope, 108.
[8] Capps, Agents of Hope, 116.
[9] Frederick Townes Melges, Time and the Inner Future (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1982), 187.
[10] Capps, Agents of Hope, 122.
[11] Capps, Agents of Hope, 123.
[12] Capps, Agents of Hope, 125.
[13] Capps, Agents of Hope, 135.
[14] Capps, Agents of Hope, 136.
[15] Capps, Agents of Hope, 138.
[16] Erik H. Erickson, Childhood and Society (New York: W. W. Norton, 1963), 248.
[17] Capps, Agents of Hope, 141.
[18] Capps, Agents of Hope, 144.
[19] Capps, Agents of Hope, 145.
[20] Capps, Agents of Hope, 148.
[21] Capps, Agents of Hope, 151.
[22] Capps, Agents of Hope, 152.
[23] Capps, Agents of Hope, 156.
[24] Capps, Agents of Hope, 157.
[25] Capps, Agents of Hope, 161.
[26] Capps, Agents of Hope, 165.
[27] Capps, Agents of Hope, 173.
[28] Capps, Agents of Hope, 175.
[29] Donald Capps, Pastoral Care: A Thematic Approach (Eugene: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2003), 113.
[30] Capps, Pastoral Care, 114.
[31] Capps, Pastoral Care, 115.