Showing posts with label repentance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label repentance. Show all posts

Wednesday, 23 September 2015

From repentance to hope


(notes taken from Donald Capps’ two books: 1) Agents of Hope and 2) Pastoral Care: A thematic approach.)

There are three attitudes where, once internalised and well established, poses a powerful threat to the maintenance of a hopeful attitude toward life: despair, apathy and shame.[1]

Despair is the perception that what is wanted will not happen, the sense that what is realisable for others is not realisable for me, in spite of the fact that I very much desire it.[2] It essentially takes two forms: It may be projected outward in the form of disgust directed against other persons or institutions, or it may be deeply internalised in the form of depression. What makes it so difficult to combat is that it feeds on itself in a downward spiral of hopelessness. It involves the perception that the future, already narrowed, is foreshortened, either because it is too late to start over, or because the future is blocked.[3] In despair, we place a great deal of blame on ourselves for the failure of our hopes to materialise. It is our deficiency, the inadequacy of our own skills and abilities, which is primarily responsible for the frustration of our hopes.[4] It is only when one recognises the grace of God that our hopes are kept alive.[5]

Apathy is the state of desirelessness together with a strong element of “not caring” about what is happening around us, to us, or within us.[6] Humans are by nature desiring beings since we are always experiencing the presence of an absence. Apathy is a condition that is the very antithesis of human nature.[7] It sees no meaningful connection between short-term activities and long-term goals, eg. I will become my father’s successor as the CEO of the family business when he eventually retires.[8] The sociopathic personality is one who have no realisable hopes beyond the most immediate present. Even short-term desires are difficult to entertain because there are no long-term aspirations or desires to which these more immediate desires are related. The sociopath, beginning in childhood, has never had much hope for the long-term future and is therefore “geared primarily to getting immediate gratification in the present and near future.”[9] Boredom and indifference are characteristics of apathy, because they have ceased to love: no love for the other, no love for self, and no love for the world of nearly infinite possibility. Perhaps the only way for apathetic selves to find hope again is to rekindle the fires of love that have long since been extinguished, for love is the ultimate source of all desire.[10]

Shame is the painful realisation that events have in fact turned out very differently from what was hoped for and confidently expected. Another words, we have made a serious misprojection of ourselves.[11] In fact, the pain of realising that we have been wrong, stupid, or naïve, that we have assumed too much, is usually considered punishment enough. And we may have invested a lot in these hoped-for outcomes.[12]

In summary, the three major threats to the maintenance of a hopeful attitude in life. Despair occurs when we have reason to believe that what we desire so much to come about is not likely to occur after all. Apathy occurs when we no longer invest desire in anything that is happening to us, and it usually results from the fact that the future is already determined. Shame occurs when what we confidently expected to happen does not occur and we are faced with the painful realisation that we put our trust and confidence in a reality that was not there.[13] What is so devastating about these threats to hope is not only that it makes us more reluctant to entertain specific hopes, but that we allow them to affect our basic sense of who we are, our very selfhood. The capacity to hope is the core of human selfhood, and this is why despair, apathy, and shame are so destructive of the human self.[14]

Three attitudes that undergird hope are trust, patience, and modesty.

The general meaning of trust is a confident expectation, anticipation, or hope for the future. Another more specific meaning is a firm belief or confidence in the honest, integrity, relationship, or justice of another person or thing.[15] It is like the “general state of trust” found among infants where they have learned to rely on the sameness and continuity of the outer providers.[16] Another meaning of trust involves the act of entrusting something of value to us into the hand of another person or institution, eg. entrusting our children to the care of teachers and schools. We have relinquished control over the fate or future of what is of value to us by entrusting it to the care of the other. Entrusting is a voluntary act.[17] Fear is the experience that threatens our natural disposition to trust and our willingness to entrust ourselves and that is dear to us to another. The source of fear can be outside of us as the world is not a uniformly safe place to be. It may also be due to the fact that persons on whom we must rely are unreliable or even abusive.[18] In order to hope, we must have the experience of trust.[19]

Patience is concerned with keeping hopes alive. It is the will or ability to wait or endure without complaint; and it is steadiness, endurance, or perseverance in performing a task. One is to wait in an uncomplaining manner, accepting and serene. Patience is what we develop by engaging in difficult tasks without giving up: steadiness, endurance, perseverance.[20] Frustration is the experience that creates the need for patients. Basic to apathy is the experience of frustration and patience is the human capacity to enable us to endure it. Patience is the assurance that the hoped-for outcome is worth the frustration and therefore keeps us steadfast in our hope.[21] As patience develops into an enduring attitude, it, in turn, enables us to keep our sense of frustration at manageable levels so that we do not abandon our hopes.[22]

Modesty the avoidance of excesses or extremes, whereby we remain situated within the real world and do not try to distance ourselves from it. It is a self-referential statement about ourselves where in hoping, we try to avoid the self-deception that occurs when we take leave of the real world and enter a fantasy world.[23] It is an appropriate reaction to the failure of hope to materialise and a positive alternative to shame. By recognising our place in the world and accepting the fact that our hopes are vulnerable to events and circumstances beyond our power to control, an attitude of modesty regarding ourselves can emerge which fortifies us against shame. Our power to influence and control events is necessarily limited, as we are not omniscient beings who are able to anticipate everything that may or may not happen in the future, and we will continue to hope in spite of this knowledge.[24]

Because we trust, we are able to exercise greater patience. Because our attitude is one of modesty, we are conscious of the necessity of trust. These, then, are not discrete virtues, but a system of dispositions that support and enhance one another. Most importantly, the three of them together assume a life of their own and sustain the hopeful self even as specific hopes may go unrealised.[25]

The meaning any event has for us depends upon the frame in which we perceive it. When we change the frame, we change the meaning. Reframing is changing the frame in which a person perceives events in order to change the meaning. When the meaning changes, the person’s responses and behaviours also change. There are two reframing methods in which pastors may use to encourage hopefulness. One is the method of envisioning the future, the other is the method of revising the past. The first method encourages us to take a future persepective on the present. The second invites us to locate our past with a new frame, thereby revising the meaning it has held for us, and thus “changing” the past from a basis for hopelessness into a basis and resource for hopefulness.[26] Revisiting and rebiographing it is one way of reframing. One possible meaning of repentance is that one’s sinful past is blotted out, like an erased debt. Another is that one’s sinful past is rectified. The story of Joseph is a biblical example of rebiographing[27], whereby he turned his brothers’ act of betrayal into a “useful event for humanity”, a viable method of reframing because it is grounded in the boundless mercy of God, who is able to take sinful actions that we or others committed in the past and make them something better than we would ever have imagined. Therefore, rebiographing makes the past as open and possibility-filled as the future.[28]


Theological themes in pastoral counselling:
l   Providence: trust vs. mistrust. The theological theme focuses on the counselee’s sense that the world is under God’s guidance and therefore trustworthy. The psychosocial theme concerns the counselee’s sense of being able to rely on the sameness and continuity of other providers.
l   Grace or gratefulness: autonomy vs. shame and self-doubt. The theological theme recognises that the counselee often rejects the kindness and generosity of others[29] because he has an excessive sense of his own unworthiness. The psychological theme focuses on the counselee’s capacity to appropriate the goodwill of others when he is not overcome with feelings of shame and self-doubt.
l   Repentance: Initiative vs. guilt. The theological theme focuses on the counselee’s acceptance of an appropriate level of moral responsibility for his situation. The psychosocial theme focuses on the counselee’s capacity not to allow himself to become immobilised by guilt on the one hand or to display excessive self-righteousness on the other.
l   Vocation: industry vs. inferiority. The theological theme focuses on the counselee’s sense of purpose, dedication, personal competence and effectiveness.[30] The psychosocial theme centres on the counselee’s capacity to participate in a productive situation and bring it to completion.
l   Faith: identity vs identity diffusion. The theological theme focuses on the counselee’s affirmative attitude toward life; his religious proclivities as widening his scope of engagement. The psychosocial theme centres on the counselee’s desire to affirm and be affirmed by others; it manifests itself in a concern to integrate one’s experiences to date into a widening radius of psychosocial commitments and expressions of fidelity.
l   Communion: intimacy vs. isolation. The theological theme focuses on the counselee’s sense of being accepted into social groups that matter to him. The psychosocial theme focuses on the counselee’s capacity to commit himself to concrete affiliations, even though they may call for significant sacrifices and compromises.
l   Vocation: generativity vs. stagnation. The theological theme focuses on the counselee’s sense of purpose, dedication, personal competence, and effectiveness. The psychosocial theme centres on the counselee’s capacity to play a productive role on behalf of other people, especially the younger generation.
l   Awareness of the holy: integrity vs. despair. The theological theme focuses on the counselee’s relationship to powers or forces beyond himself. The psychosocial theme centres on his sense of comradeship with the cultural forces that have shaped his life.[31]




[1] Donald Capps, Agents of Hope: A pastoral psychology (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1995), 98.
[2] Capps, Agents of Hope, 99.
[3] Capps, Agents of Hope, 105.
[4] Capps, Agents of Hope, 105.
[5] Capps, Agents of Hope, 107.
[6] Capps, Agents of Hope, 107.
[7] Capps, Agents of Hope, 108.
[8] Capps, Agents of Hope, 116.
[9] Frederick Townes Melges, Time and the Inner Future (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1982), 187.
[10] Capps, Agents of Hope, 122.
[11] Capps, Agents of Hope, 123.
[12] Capps, Agents of Hope, 125.
[13] Capps, Agents of Hope, 135.
[14] Capps, Agents of Hope, 136.
[15] Capps, Agents of Hope, 138.
[16] Erik H. Erickson, Childhood and Society (New York: W. W. Norton, 1963), 248.
[17] Capps, Agents of Hope, 141.
[18] Capps, Agents of Hope, 144.
[19] Capps, Agents of Hope, 145.
[20] Capps, Agents of Hope, 148.
[21] Capps, Agents of Hope, 151.
[22] Capps, Agents of Hope, 152.
[23] Capps, Agents of Hope, 156.
[24] Capps, Agents of Hope, 157.
[25] Capps, Agents of Hope, 161.
[26] Capps, Agents of Hope, 165.
[27] Capps, Agents of Hope, 173.
[28] Capps, Agents of Hope, 175.
[29] Donald Capps, Pastoral Care: A Thematic Approach (Eugene: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2003), 113.
[30] Capps, Pastoral Care, 114.
[31] Capps, Pastoral Care, 115.

Sunday, 14 June 2015

Role of the Holy Spirit and humans in relation to faith, repentance,conversion and regeneration


The internal working of the Holy Spirit:
l   There are a number of reasons why the illumination of the Holy Spirit is needed if the human is to understand the meaning of the Bible and be certain of its truth.[1]
n   First, there is the ontological difference between God and humanity. Correlated with God’s transcendence is human finiteness. Humans cannot formulate concepts that are commensurate with the nature of God.
n   Furthermore, there are also limitations that result from human sinfulness.
n   Finally, human beings require certainty with respect to divine matters, eg. Of life and death. It is necessary to have more than mere probability. Our need for certainty is in direct proportion to the importance of what is at stake; in matters of eternal consequence.
l   In Matthew 13:13-15, Jesus speaks of those who hear but never understand and see but never perceive. These references argue for the need of some special work of the Spirit to enhance human perception and understanding. 1Corinthians 2:14 Paul tells us that the natural person (the one who neither perceives nor understands) has not received the gifts of the Spirit of God.[2] Natural humans do not accept the gifts of the Spirit because they find the wisdom of God foolish. They are unable to understand it because it must be spiritually discerned or investigated.
l   John 14-16 talks about the functions of the Holy Spirit:[3]
n   The HS will teach the believers all things and bring to their remembrance that Jesus has taught them. John 14:26.
n   The HS will witness to Jesus. John 15:26-27.
n   The HS will convict the world of sin, righteousness, and judgment. John 16:8.
n   The HS will guide believers into all the truth. He will not speak on his own authority, but will speak whatever he hears. In the process, he will also glorify Jesus. John 16:13-14.

The logical order of salvation:
l   Effectual callingà Conversionà Regeneration
l   Effectual calling: Because all human are lost in sin, spiritually blind, and unable to believe, some action by God must intervene in such a way that their eyes are opened to see the glory of God in Christ, and their hearts enabled to respond in repentance and faith.[4] This activity of God is termed effectual calling.
l   God regenerates those who repent and believe.
l   Conversion: The act of turning from one’s sin in repentance and turning to Christ in faith. It is a single entity that has two distinguishable but inseparable aspects: repentance and faith.
n   Repentance: the unbeliever’s turning away from sin.
n   Faith: The unbeliever’s turning toward Christ.
l   In some cases, conversion appears to have been a cataclysmic decision, taking place virtually in a moment’s time. This was likely with the great majority of those who were converted at Pentecost. For others, conversion was more of a process, very simple and calm in nature.[5]

Repentance[6]:
l   It is in the preaching of John (Mark 1:4), Jesus (Mark 1:15), Peter (Acts 2:38) and Paul (Acts 17:30-31; 20:21)
l   Mark 1:4; Acts 17:30-31: it is eschatological in that it relates to the Kingdom
l   2Corinthians 7:10: godly sorrow for one’s sin, together with a resolution to turn from it
l   Acts 20:21: Not just turning from sin” but also a turning “toward God”, Acts 17:30-31: commanded by God of all people
l   Acts 5:31: Granted by God to those whom he saves
l   The medieval church translated Christ’s call to repentance in Mk 1:15 (“Do penance…”) and identified it with the sacrament of penance.
l   Luther argued against the idea that “repentance” was to be identified with the church-administered sacrament of penance: “The word cannot be properly understood as referring to the sacrament of penance, i.e. confession and satisfaction, as administered by the clergy” (95 Theses, no. 2).
l   However he did not restrict the concept of repentance to initial repentance, but retained a strong concept of continuing penitence as fundamental to Christian existence: “When our Lord and Master, Jesus Christ, said ‘Repent’, He called for the entire life of believers to be one of repentance.” (95 Theses, no. 1)

Faith[7]:
l   The chief word group is the pisteuō (pisteuw= to believe) family. The noun, pistij (pistis) is used for the NT quotations of Hab 2:4 (Rom 1:17; Gal 3:11; Heb 10:38), and seems to carry overtones of both trusting reliance and enduring faithfulness (cf. Heb 10:35 – 11:1).
l   The idea of faith as trust (ie. “faith in…”, not merely “faith that…”) is suggested by the prepositions associated with pisteuw. evn (en = in) and evpi (epi = upon) suggest rest on a reliable foundation (e.g., Mk 1:15; Rom 9:33 respectively); the use of eivj (eis = “into”) indicates “a movement of trust going out to, and laying hold of, the object of its confidence” (EDT., p. 933; Jn 2:11; 3:16 and often in John).
l   Erickson summarises, “On the basis of the foregoing considerations, we conclude that the type of faith necessary for salvation involves both believing that and believing in, or assenting to facts and trusting in a person. It is vital to keep these two together. Sometimes in the history of Christian thought one of the aspects of faith has been so strongly emphasized as to make the other seem rather insignificant.”

Repentance and Faith[8]
l   Each on its own can be used to describe the response required by the gospel (eg. repentance in Acts 17:30; faith in John 20:31), or the two terms can be bracketed together in a pair (eg. Mark 1:15, Acts 20:21).
l   New Hampshire Confession, Art. 8: “We believe that Repentance and Faith are sacred duties, and also inseparable graces, wrought in our souls by the regenerating Spirit of God; whereby being deeply convinced of our guilt, danger, and helplessness, and of the way of salvation by Christ, we turn to God with unfeigned contrition, confession, and supplication for mercy; at the same time heartily receiving the Lord Jesus Christ as our Prophet, Priest, and King, and relying on him alone as the only and all-sufficient Saviour.”
l   This view of the inseparability of repentance and faith can be contrasted with the view held in some dispensationalist circles that saving faith can exist in the absence of repentance from sin. “The New Testament does not impose repentance upon the unsaved as a condition of salvation…. [The preacher’s task is that of] preaching the Lordship of Christ to Christians exclusively and the Saviourhood of Christ to those who are unsaved.” L.S.Chafer, Systematic Theology vol. 3 pp.376, 387.
l   Calvin argued that the relationship between repentance and faith (which are to be distinguished but not separated) is ordered from faith to repentance. True repentance is “evangelical repentance”, which has its foundation in the gospel, embraced by faith: “When this topic is rightly understood, it will better appear how man is justified  by faith alone, and simple pardon; nevertheless actual holiness of life, so to speak, is not to be separated from free imputation of righteousness. Repentance not only constantly follows faith, but is also born of faith…” (Institutes III.3.1-2) This is the case, not only at the beginning of the Christian life but also throughout its entirety.

Regeneration
l   Definitions
n   Calvin, Institutes III.3.9:  “we are restored by this regeneration through the benefit of Christ into the righteousness of God, from which we had fallen through Adam… And indeed this restoration does not take place in one moment or one day or one year, but through continual and sometimes even slow advances…”
n   Wesley (Sermons no.45):  “It is that great change which God works in the soul when he brings it into life; when he raises it from the death of sin to the life of righteousness. It is the change wrought in the whole soul by the almighty Spirit of God when it is ‘created anew in Christ Jesus’… As the new birth is not the same thing with baptism, so it does not always accompany baptism: they do not constantly go together… I do not now speak with regard to infants.”
n   Finney, Systematic Theology, Lecture 27: “Regeneration is… a change in the attitude of the will, or a change in its ultimate choice, intention of preference; a change from selfishness to benevolence… Neither God, nor any other being, can regenerate him, if he will not turn.”
n   Regeneration/new birth is the restoration of human nature to what it originally was intended to be and what in fact was before sin entered the human race at the time of the fall.[9]
n   It is instantaneously complete, but not an end in itself. Regeneration is the beginning of a process of growth that continues throughout one’s lifetime. This process of spiritual maturation is sanctification.[10]
n   Regeneration is especially the work of the Holy Spirit, thus bringing to fulfillment the divine intention for humans.[11]
n   The doctrine of regeneration places the Christian faith in an unusual position. On one hand, Christians reject the current secular belief in the goodness of the human. The very insistence on regeneration is a declaration that without external help and complete transformation there is no possibility that genuine good on a large scale will emerge from humankind. On the other hand, despite the pessimistic assessment of human’s natural powers, Christianity is very optimistic: with supernatural aid humans can be transformed and restored to their original goodness.[12]
l   Scriptures
n   Rebirth and renewal
n   John 3:5-8: Jesus answered, “Very truly I tell you, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless they are born of water and the Spirit. Flesh gives birth to flesh, but the Spirit gives birth to spirit. You should not be surprised at my saying, ‘You must be born again.’ The wind blows wherever it pleases. You hear its sound, but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is going. So it is with everyone born of the Spirit.” Rebirth, supernatural occurrence.
n   1Peter 1:23: For you have been born again, not of perishable seed, but of imperishable, through the living and enduring word of God.
n   Matthew 19:28: Jesus said to them, “Truly I tell you, at the renewal of all things, when the Son of Man sits on his glorious throne, you who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.


References:

Clifford, Ross. “Work of the Spirit.” Lecture Notes, Morling College, May 26, 2015.

Erickson, Millard J. Christian Theology. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2013.







[1] Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2013), 216.
[2] Erickson, Christian Theology, 218.
[3] Erickson, Christian Theology, 219.
[4] Ross Clifford, “Work of the Spirit,” (Lecture Notes, Morling College, May 26, 2015), 3.
[5] Erickson, Christian Theology, 865.
[6] Clifford, “Work of the Spirit,” 4.
[7] Clifford, “Work of the Spirit,” 2.
[8] Clifford, “Work of the Spirit,” 5.
[9] Erickson, Christian Theology, 874.
[10] Erickson, Christian Theology, 874.
[11] Erickson, Christian Theology, 875.
[12] Erickson, Christian Theology, 875.