Sunday 14 June 2015

Role of the Holy Spirit and humans in relation to faith, repentance,conversion and regeneration


The internal working of the Holy Spirit:
l   There are a number of reasons why the illumination of the Holy Spirit is needed if the human is to understand the meaning of the Bible and be certain of its truth.[1]
n   First, there is the ontological difference between God and humanity. Correlated with God’s transcendence is human finiteness. Humans cannot formulate concepts that are commensurate with the nature of God.
n   Furthermore, there are also limitations that result from human sinfulness.
n   Finally, human beings require certainty with respect to divine matters, eg. Of life and death. It is necessary to have more than mere probability. Our need for certainty is in direct proportion to the importance of what is at stake; in matters of eternal consequence.
l   In Matthew 13:13-15, Jesus speaks of those who hear but never understand and see but never perceive. These references argue for the need of some special work of the Spirit to enhance human perception and understanding. 1Corinthians 2:14 Paul tells us that the natural person (the one who neither perceives nor understands) has not received the gifts of the Spirit of God.[2] Natural humans do not accept the gifts of the Spirit because they find the wisdom of God foolish. They are unable to understand it because it must be spiritually discerned or investigated.
l   John 14-16 talks about the functions of the Holy Spirit:[3]
n   The HS will teach the believers all things and bring to their remembrance that Jesus has taught them. John 14:26.
n   The HS will witness to Jesus. John 15:26-27.
n   The HS will convict the world of sin, righteousness, and judgment. John 16:8.
n   The HS will guide believers into all the truth. He will not speak on his own authority, but will speak whatever he hears. In the process, he will also glorify Jesus. John 16:13-14.

The logical order of salvation:
l   Effectual callingà Conversionà Regeneration
l   Effectual calling: Because all human are lost in sin, spiritually blind, and unable to believe, some action by God must intervene in such a way that their eyes are opened to see the glory of God in Christ, and their hearts enabled to respond in repentance and faith.[4] This activity of God is termed effectual calling.
l   God regenerates those who repent and believe.
l   Conversion: The act of turning from one’s sin in repentance and turning to Christ in faith. It is a single entity that has two distinguishable but inseparable aspects: repentance and faith.
n   Repentance: the unbeliever’s turning away from sin.
n   Faith: The unbeliever’s turning toward Christ.
l   In some cases, conversion appears to have been a cataclysmic decision, taking place virtually in a moment’s time. This was likely with the great majority of those who were converted at Pentecost. For others, conversion was more of a process, very simple and calm in nature.[5]

Repentance[6]:
l   It is in the preaching of John (Mark 1:4), Jesus (Mark 1:15), Peter (Acts 2:38) and Paul (Acts 17:30-31; 20:21)
l   Mark 1:4; Acts 17:30-31: it is eschatological in that it relates to the Kingdom
l   2Corinthians 7:10: godly sorrow for one’s sin, together with a resolution to turn from it
l   Acts 20:21: Not just turning from sin” but also a turning “toward God”, Acts 17:30-31: commanded by God of all people
l   Acts 5:31: Granted by God to those whom he saves
l   The medieval church translated Christ’s call to repentance in Mk 1:15 (“Do penance…”) and identified it with the sacrament of penance.
l   Luther argued against the idea that “repentance” was to be identified with the church-administered sacrament of penance: “The word cannot be properly understood as referring to the sacrament of penance, i.e. confession and satisfaction, as administered by the clergy” (95 Theses, no. 2).
l   However he did not restrict the concept of repentance to initial repentance, but retained a strong concept of continuing penitence as fundamental to Christian existence: “When our Lord and Master, Jesus Christ, said ‘Repent’, He called for the entire life of believers to be one of repentance.” (95 Theses, no. 1)

Faith[7]:
l   The chief word group is the pisteuō (pisteuw= to believe) family. The noun, pistij (pistis) is used for the NT quotations of Hab 2:4 (Rom 1:17; Gal 3:11; Heb 10:38), and seems to carry overtones of both trusting reliance and enduring faithfulness (cf. Heb 10:35 – 11:1).
l   The idea of faith as trust (ie. “faith in…”, not merely “faith that…”) is suggested by the prepositions associated with pisteuw. evn (en = in) and evpi (epi = upon) suggest rest on a reliable foundation (e.g., Mk 1:15; Rom 9:33 respectively); the use of eivj (eis = “into”) indicates “a movement of trust going out to, and laying hold of, the object of its confidence” (EDT., p. 933; Jn 2:11; 3:16 and often in John).
l   Erickson summarises, “On the basis of the foregoing considerations, we conclude that the type of faith necessary for salvation involves both believing that and believing in, or assenting to facts and trusting in a person. It is vital to keep these two together. Sometimes in the history of Christian thought one of the aspects of faith has been so strongly emphasized as to make the other seem rather insignificant.”

Repentance and Faith[8]
l   Each on its own can be used to describe the response required by the gospel (eg. repentance in Acts 17:30; faith in John 20:31), or the two terms can be bracketed together in a pair (eg. Mark 1:15, Acts 20:21).
l   New Hampshire Confession, Art. 8: “We believe that Repentance and Faith are sacred duties, and also inseparable graces, wrought in our souls by the regenerating Spirit of God; whereby being deeply convinced of our guilt, danger, and helplessness, and of the way of salvation by Christ, we turn to God with unfeigned contrition, confession, and supplication for mercy; at the same time heartily receiving the Lord Jesus Christ as our Prophet, Priest, and King, and relying on him alone as the only and all-sufficient Saviour.”
l   This view of the inseparability of repentance and faith can be contrasted with the view held in some dispensationalist circles that saving faith can exist in the absence of repentance from sin. “The New Testament does not impose repentance upon the unsaved as a condition of salvation…. [The preacher’s task is that of] preaching the Lordship of Christ to Christians exclusively and the Saviourhood of Christ to those who are unsaved.” L.S.Chafer, Systematic Theology vol. 3 pp.376, 387.
l   Calvin argued that the relationship between repentance and faith (which are to be distinguished but not separated) is ordered from faith to repentance. True repentance is “evangelical repentance”, which has its foundation in the gospel, embraced by faith: “When this topic is rightly understood, it will better appear how man is justified  by faith alone, and simple pardon; nevertheless actual holiness of life, so to speak, is not to be separated from free imputation of righteousness. Repentance not only constantly follows faith, but is also born of faith…” (Institutes III.3.1-2) This is the case, not only at the beginning of the Christian life but also throughout its entirety.

Regeneration
l   Definitions
n   Calvin, Institutes III.3.9:  “we are restored by this regeneration through the benefit of Christ into the righteousness of God, from which we had fallen through Adam… And indeed this restoration does not take place in one moment or one day or one year, but through continual and sometimes even slow advances…”
n   Wesley (Sermons no.45):  “It is that great change which God works in the soul when he brings it into life; when he raises it from the death of sin to the life of righteousness. It is the change wrought in the whole soul by the almighty Spirit of God when it is ‘created anew in Christ Jesus’… As the new birth is not the same thing with baptism, so it does not always accompany baptism: they do not constantly go together… I do not now speak with regard to infants.”
n   Finney, Systematic Theology, Lecture 27: “Regeneration is… a change in the attitude of the will, or a change in its ultimate choice, intention of preference; a change from selfishness to benevolence… Neither God, nor any other being, can regenerate him, if he will not turn.”
n   Regeneration/new birth is the restoration of human nature to what it originally was intended to be and what in fact was before sin entered the human race at the time of the fall.[9]
n   It is instantaneously complete, but not an end in itself. Regeneration is the beginning of a process of growth that continues throughout one’s lifetime. This process of spiritual maturation is sanctification.[10]
n   Regeneration is especially the work of the Holy Spirit, thus bringing to fulfillment the divine intention for humans.[11]
n   The doctrine of regeneration places the Christian faith in an unusual position. On one hand, Christians reject the current secular belief in the goodness of the human. The very insistence on regeneration is a declaration that without external help and complete transformation there is no possibility that genuine good on a large scale will emerge from humankind. On the other hand, despite the pessimistic assessment of human’s natural powers, Christianity is very optimistic: with supernatural aid humans can be transformed and restored to their original goodness.[12]
l   Scriptures
n   Rebirth and renewal
n   John 3:5-8: Jesus answered, “Very truly I tell you, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless they are born of water and the Spirit. Flesh gives birth to flesh, but the Spirit gives birth to spirit. You should not be surprised at my saying, ‘You must be born again.’ The wind blows wherever it pleases. You hear its sound, but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is going. So it is with everyone born of the Spirit.” Rebirth, supernatural occurrence.
n   1Peter 1:23: For you have been born again, not of perishable seed, but of imperishable, through the living and enduring word of God.
n   Matthew 19:28: Jesus said to them, “Truly I tell you, at the renewal of all things, when the Son of Man sits on his glorious throne, you who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.


References:

Clifford, Ross. “Work of the Spirit.” Lecture Notes, Morling College, May 26, 2015.

Erickson, Millard J. Christian Theology. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2013.







[1] Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2013), 216.
[2] Erickson, Christian Theology, 218.
[3] Erickson, Christian Theology, 219.
[4] Ross Clifford, “Work of the Spirit,” (Lecture Notes, Morling College, May 26, 2015), 3.
[5] Erickson, Christian Theology, 865.
[6] Clifford, “Work of the Spirit,” 4.
[7] Clifford, “Work of the Spirit,” 2.
[8] Clifford, “Work of the Spirit,” 5.
[9] Erickson, Christian Theology, 874.
[10] Erickson, Christian Theology, 874.
[11] Erickson, Christian Theology, 875.
[12] Erickson, Christian Theology, 875.

Saturday 13 June 2015

Calvinism (Predestination) vs Arminianism (Free will)

Predestination is the decision of God choosing who will be saved and who will be lost.


Arminianism
Calvinism
Moderate Calvinism
Definition
Prevenient grace (which is given to all indiscriminately) is universal and essential for conversion. The conditional choice of God by which he determined who would believe based on his foreknowledge of who will exercise faith. It is the result of Man’s faith. Grace is not irresistible.[1]
The unconditional and loving choice of God by which he determines who must believe. It is the cause of man’s faith.
The unconditional and loving choice of God by which he determines who will believe. It is the cause of man’s faith.
Scriptural evidence
1Timothy 2:3-4
This is good, and pleases God our Saviour, who wants all people to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth.
Romans 9:6-24
Ephesians 1:3-6

Total Depravity
Although human nature was seriously affected by the fall, man has not been left in a state of total spiritual helplessness. God does not interfere with man’s freedom. Each sinner possesses a free will, and his eternal destiny depends on how he uses it. Faith is the sinner’s gift to God.
Because of the fall, the sinner is dead, blind, and deaf to the things of God. He cannot choose good over evil in the spiritual realm. Consequently it takes much more than the Spirit’s assistance to bring a sinner to Christ. It takes regeneration by which the Spirit makes the sinner alive and gives him a new nature. Salvation is God’s gift to the sinner.
Being “dead” in sin does not mean that unsaved people cannot understand and receive the truth of the gospel as the Spirit of God works on their hearts.[2]
Unconditional Election
God’s choice of certain individuals to salvation before the foundation of the world was based on his foreseeing that they would respond to his call. The faith God foresaw resulted from man’s free will, cooperating the Spirit’s working.
God’s choice of certain individuals to salvation rested solely in his own sovereign will, not based on any foreseen response or obedience on their part, such as faith, repentance etc. Thus God’s choice of the sinner, not the sinner’s choice of Christ, is the ultimate cause of salvation.
It is unconditional from the standpoint of the Giver, even though there is one condition for the receiver – faith.[3]
Limited Atonement
Christ’s redeeming work made it possible for everyone to be saved but did not secure the salvation of anyone. Only those who believe in him are saved.
Christ’s redeeming work was intended to save the elect only and actually secured salvation for them. The gift of faith is infallibly applied by the Spirit to all for whom Christ died, therefore guaranteeing their salvation.
Extremist view is limited in extent (only for elect), while moderate view is limited in result (but for all men). Another words, although redemption was purchased for all and available to all, it will only be applied to those whom God chose from all eternity – the elect. [4]
Irresistible Grace
Man is free and can successfully resist the Spirit’s call.
In addition to the outward general call to salvation, which is made to everyone who hears the Gospel, the Holy Spirit extends to the elect a special inward call that inevitably brings them to salvation. God’s grace, therefore, is invincible.
Extreme Calvinism: irresistible grace happens in a compulsive sense (against man’s will). Moderate Calvinism: in a persuasive sense (in accordance with man’s will).[5]
Perseverance of the Saints
Those who believe and are truly saved can lose their salvation by failing to keep up their faith.
All who are chosen by God are eternally saved.
Extreme Calvinism: no saint will die in sin. Moderate Calvinism: No saint will ever be lost (even if he dies in sin).[6]
Salvation “once saved, always saved”
Possible for the saved to lose salvation. Colossian 1:23 is often used in connection with this: “if you continue in your faith, established and firm, not moved from the hope held out in the gospel.”
Strong scriptural evidence, eg. John 10:27-28. However weakened by sin, true believers endure in their faith to the end.[7]


The seemingly endless debate between Calvinism and Arminianism continues on today, and polarised beliefs have created division in the church. 

If God is in control of everything, then why should we be blamed for anything? Some believers have been known to excuse their sin, claiming: “The devil made me do it!” But the problem here is even greater, because logically one cannot stop at this point. For if God is in sovereign control of all things, then instead it would appear that, ultimately, “God made me do it!”[8] And who made the devil do it? God cannot be good and not good. He cannot be for His own essential good and be against it by giving Lucifer the desire to sin against him![9] The bible affirms that God made only good creatures. After almost every day of Creation it says, “and it was good”. But God gave free choice to good creatures, as God said to Adam: “You are free…” (Genesis 2:16). The power of moral free choice entails the ability either to choose the good God designed for us or to reject it. The latter is called evil. It is good to be free, but freedom makes evil possible. Free will is good in itself, but entailed in that good is the ability to choose the opposite of good, which then makes evil possible. Then the origin of evil is in the misuse of freedom.[10]

Staunch Calvinist Jonathan Edwards “solved” the problem of predestination and free will by claiming that, 1) free will is doing what we desire; 2) but God gives us the desire to do good. What about the desire to do evil? That comes from our fallen nature, which desires only evil. However, this does not solve the issue of where Lucifer and Adam got the desire for their first sin, as 1) God cannot give anyone the desire to sin; 2) originally neither Lucifer nor Adam had a sinful nature; 3) the will does not move unless given a desire by God or by its own nature.[11] Then here’s the unmistakable conclusion: both Lucifer Adam sinned because God gave them the desire to sin!![12]

If neither the devil nor God made me do it, then who did? I did! Extreme Calvinists object to this reasoning, claiming that every event has a cause, even our actions. And to claim that God did not cause our actions would mean there is an effect without a cause, which is absurd.[13]

However, several things should be noted. First, every event does have a cause, but not every cause has a cause. Every painting has a painter, but every painter is not painted. Further, if every cause had a cause, then God could not be the first Uncaused Cause that He is. “Who made God?” Likewise, if the creature, by means of the good power of free choice, is the first cause of evil, then no cause of evil action should be sought other than the person who caused it. Secondly, if evil actions have no cause, then no one can be held responsible for them. But both good moral reason and Scripture inform us that free creatures are held morally responsible for their choices. Lucifer, Adam and Eve were condemned for their actions. If our actions are not uncaused, then is not the extreme Calvinist’s view correct that they must be cause by another? There are three possibilities: My actions are 1) uncaused; 2) caused by someone (or something) else; or 3) caused by my Self.[14]

A self-caused being is impossible but this is not true for a self-caused action. It is true that we cannot exist before we exists or be before we have being. But we can and must be before we can do. That is, we must exist before we can act. Therefore, self-caused actions are not impossible. If they were, then even God, who cannot do what is impossible, would not have been able to create the world.[15]

Contrary to the extreme Calvinist view, faith is not a gift that God offers only to some. All are responsible to believe and “whoever” decides to believe can believe (John 3:16). While all truly free acts are self-determined and could have been otherwise, nonetheless, it is also true that no free human act can move toward God or do any spiritual good without the aid of God’s grace, as evident from the scriptures: “No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him, and I will raise him up at the last day” (John 6:44).

Sovereignty and free will. Is it one or the other, or is it both one and the other? The Bible says both. God is sovereign over all things, including human events and free choices. Nothing catches God by surprise. But human beings, even in their fallen state, have the God-given power of free choice, as the Scriptures stresses that moral responsibility for moral actions rest squarely with free moral agents and not with God. This applies to many earthly things here “below” as it does to heavenly things from “above,” namely, with regard to receiving God’s gift of salvation. Unfortunately, the extreme Calvinists have sacrificed human responsibility in order to preserve divine sovereignty, and the extreme Arminians have sacrificed God’s sovereignty in order to hold on to man’s free will. I believe both of these alternatives are wrong and lead to inordinately extreme actions.[16]

One of the most powerful indications that the Bible sees no contradiction between God’s predetermination and human free choice is found in Acts 2:23. On the one hand, it declares that Jesus’ death was determined “by God’s set purpose and foreknowledge.”[17] Nonetheless, Jesus says He did it freely: “I lay down my life, only to take it up again. No one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord.” (John 10:17-18).[18]

One final illustration of the congruency between predetermination and free choice is found in the shipwreck recorded by Luke in Acts 27. Paul assured his fellow travelers in advance that “not one of you will be lost; only the ship will be destroyed”. Yet he warned them, “Unless these men stay with the ship, you cannot be saved”. Both are true. God knew in advance and had revealed to Paul that none would drown. But He also knew it would be through their free choice to stay on the ship that this would be accomplished.[19]

Extreme Calvinist view: It involves a denial of human free choice. But there are a few problems with this view. Free choice is supported by both Scripture and reason. “Irresistible grace” on the unwilling is a violation of free choice. For God is love (1John 4:16), and true love is persuasive but never coercive.[20] John Calvin faced honestly the biblical teaching that the Holy Spirit can be resisted. He recognized that Stephen said of the Jews, “You stiff-necked people, with uncircumcised hearts and ears! You are just like your fathers: You always resist the Holy Spirit!” (Acts 7:51). Calvin remarked, “Finally, they are said to be resisting the Spirit, when they stubbornly reject what He says by the prophets.” But if God’s grace can be resisted, then it is not irresistible![21]

Arminianism: The conditional choice of God by which he determined who would believe based on his foreknowledge of who will exercise faith. It is the result of man’s faith. Prevenient grace is universal and essential for conversion. The fallen human will is free and able to choose to repent and believe in response to the call of the gospel. Grace is not irresistible.[22] In terms of the role of foreknowledge, God unconditionally willed that salvation would be received on the condition of faith. Consequently, on the basis of their foreknown free choice of accept Christ, God chooses (elects) to save them. However, the difficulty with the Arminian view is that scriptures seem to say more than God simply knew what was going to happen. It appears God actually determined what would happen. God’s sovereignty means He is in control of all that happens, even the free acts of human beings. Another problem is, if God’s choice to save was based on those who choose Him, then it would not be based on divine grace but would be based on human decisions.[23]  In fact, it would suggest that God’s foreknowledge is dependent on our free choices. Finally, the whole idea of there being a chronological or even logical sequence in God’s thoughts is highly problematic for evangelical theology. God’s attention does not pass form thought to thought, for His knowledge embraces everything in a single spiritual co-intuition.[24]

Moderate Calvinism: The unconditional and loving choice of God by which he determines who will believe. It is the cause of man’s faith. Thus God works His sovereign will through the will of the elect.

Another illustration of the harmony of predetermination and free choice: Suppose you cannot watch your favourite sports event live on TV, so you videotape it. When you watch it later, the entire game and every play in it are absolutely determined and can never changed. No matter how many times you rerun it, it will always be the same. Yet when the game happened, every event was freely chosen. One may object that this is so only because the event has already occurred. In response, we only need to point out that if God is all knowing (omniscient), then from the standpoint of His foreknowledge the game was predetermined, for He knew eternally exactly how it was going to turn out, even though we did not. Therefore, God knew how we are going to use our freedom.[25]

Geisler concludes that there is no contradiction in God knowingly predetermining and predeterminately knowing from all eternity precisely what we would do with our free acts. He did not determine that they would be forced to perform free acts. What is forced is not free, and what is free is not forced. In brief, we are chosen but free.[26]

Calvinism
Strengths/ arguments for
Weaknesses/ arguments against
Romans 9:20-21. God is sovereign in all He does.

Limited atonement necessarily means God has limited His love only to some. He loves only the elect, and does not really love all sinners and desire them to be saved.[27] Extreme Calvinism is in practice a denial of the omnibenevolence of God. God cannot be all-loving if He does not love all.[28] And it would not be fair to choose only some to eternal life and passing over others. We see from the scriptures God desires everyone to be saved (1Timothy 2:3-4).
John 6. The whole human race is lost in sin. God has chosen certain people for his special grace, irrespective of their physical descent, character, or good deeds.
Free choice is supported by both Scripture and reason. “Irresistible grace” on the unwilling is a violation of free choice. For God is love (1John 4:16), and true love is persuasive but never coercive.[29] Irresistible love is forced love, and forced “love” is not love at all.[30]
Matthew 13:10-16: God has selected some to be saved, not all; and he even chosen not to reveal some truths to some people.
There is the possibility that those who have come to faith may fall from grace and lose their salvation.

References:

Clifford, Ross. “Grace and Order of Salvation.” Lecture Notes, Morling College, May 5, 2015.

Erickson, Millard J. Christian Theology. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2013.

Geisler, Norman. Chosen but free: A balanced view of divine election. Minneapolis: Bethany House Publishers, 2001.



[1] Ross Clifford, “Grace and Order of Salvation,” (Lecture Notes, Morling College, May 5, 2015), 6.
[2] Norman Geisler, Chosen but free: A balanced view of divine election, (Minneapolis: Bethany House Publishers, 2001), 120.
[3] Geisler, Chosen but free, 120.
[4] Geisler, Chosen but free, 121.
[5] Geisler, Chosen but free, 121.
[6] Geisler, Chosen but free, 120.
[7] Geisler, Chosen but free, 125.
[8] Geisler, Chosen but free, 19.
[9] Geisler, Chosen but free, 21.
[10] Geisler, Chosen but free, 22.
[11] Geisler, Chosen but free, 23.
[12] Geisler, Chosen but free, 24.
[13] Geisler, Chosen but free, 24.
[14] Geisler, Chosen but free, 25.
[15] Geisler, Chosen but free, 26.
[16] Geisler, Chosen but free, 37.
[17] Geisler, Chosen but free, 38.
[18] Geisler, Chosen but free, 39.
[19] Geisler, Chosen but free, 42.
[20] Geisler, Chosen but free, 48.
[21] Geisler, Chosen but free, 49.
[22] Clifford, “Grace and Order of Salvation,” 6.
[23] Geisler, Chosen but free, 51.
[24] Geisler, Chosen but free, 52.
[25] Geisler, Chosen but free, 45.
[26] Geisler, Chosen but free, 55.
[27] Geisler, Chosen but free, 88.
[28] Geisler, Chosen but free, 89.
[29] Geisler, Chosen but free, 48.
[30] Geisler, Chosen but free, 100.