Showing posts with label salvation army. Show all posts
Showing posts with label salvation army. Show all posts

Wednesday, 21 October 2015

Army Chaplaincy

Just saw a Youtube video illustrating William Booth's vision, of how the vision of the Salvation Army came about. 
https://youtu.be/iWzqW5LHKQs

Which reminds me, today an army chaplain came and gave a talk at Morling. It's a tough job. Army chaplains have to deal with crisis a lot of the time. During operations, they will encounter soldiers getting killed/mass injury. There are also a lot of suicides in the army. He explains that pastoral counselling and psychological counselling are different. Psychology deals with the internal stuff. Chaplaincy has to do with how people are relating to things bigger than themselves. He gave the Lindt café shooting as an illustration: lots of flowers placed, sacred place of spirituality even for those without any faith, a place with meaning beyond themselves. People have spirituality even when they don’t have a faith. He said the chaplain should see himself as a vehicle that people can use to connect people/God at certain points, not by his own power but by God’s power. He’s not the saviour, God is.

“Life isn’t like a book. Life isn’t logical or sensible or orderly. Life is a mess most of the time. And theology must be lived in the midst of that mess.” Charles Caleb Colton.

And just an aside on the topic of human rights/wars in the ethics lecture on human rights: Children in war zones picking up guns left behind by dead soldiers after seeing their families getting killed etc, and learning how to use it to protect themselves. Who is responsible for these children becoming like this? Who initiated these crimes against humanity? Poverty, environmental damage, unsustainable development, rivalry, tension rises, tribal conflicts begin. Where was the church when these were happening? We not only need to pray for this, we also need to expand our way of thinking about mission.

_____

Here are some lecture notes on army chaplaincy from Morling College (notes from the college, not by today's speaker):

A military chaplain ministers to military personnel and, in most cases, their families and civilians working for the military. In some cases they will also work with local civilians within a military area of operations.
Although the term chaplain originally had Christian roots, it is generally used today in military organizations to describe all professionals specially trained to serve any spiritual need, regardless of religious affiliation.
In addition to offering pastoral care  to individuals, and supporting their religious rights and needs, military chaplains may also advise the executive on issues of religion, ethics morale, and morals. They may also liaise with local religious leaders in an effort to understand the role of religion as both a factor in hostility and war and as a force for reconciliation and peace.
Military chaplains normally represent a religion or faith group but work with military personnel of all faiths and none. As of 2006, there were 151 serving regular chaplains in the Australian Army; belonging to either one of several Christian churches, or to the Jewish faith both female and male. There were also chaplains in the Australian Army Reserve. 

Qualifications Required:

       Have to be ordained by your Denomination
       Supported by the denominational office to be accepted.
       Need to pass through the required training

Rank:

The Australian Army Chaplains' Department has two cap badges, for its Christian and Jewish officers. Army chaplains, although are all commissioned officers of the Australian Army and wear uniform, do not carry arms (and are the only officers not to carry swords on parade). At services on formal occasions, chaplains wear their medals and decorations on their clerical robes.
By ranking as an Officer they can access and talk to both Officers and non Commissioned officers.
Chaplains in the Australian Army begin their commission as a Captain. There are five levels or "divisions" for the seniority of chaplains in the Australian Army and Air Force with each division corresponding to a worn rank.

Part of the Role Description from DefenceJobs[1]
Pastoral Care.  In practising vocational pursuit of pastoral care, the chaplain is furthering the leadership objectives of the military commander. In the exercise of pastoral care, the chaplain visits personnel in their work place, and accompanies them on exercises and goes with them into operations. The chaplain supports them through anxiety fear, stress, moral dilemmas, guilt, fatigue, boredom and loneliness. They accept human frailty in a helpful non-condemnatory manner, but at the same time upholds and strives to exemplify standards of conduct, which conform to the ethics of their faith. They endeavour to inspire and strengthen a sense of personal dignity and commonality of purpose; in so doing they are at one with the commander. Pastoral care also extends beyond the Serviceperson to the family. The chaplain’s ability to enter into the domestic life of personnel and the confidential position, in which they are placed, enable them to be an important and vital member of the family support team. They are able to address the problems and, in conjunction with other agencies, provide advice and seek remedies, which will benefit the Serviceperson and their families.

The chaplain encourages the ill and the wounded and thus assists the healing process and, especially in combat, provides consolation for the dying. As part of the family support organisation, the chaplain has an important role in providing support for the bereaved and comfort in distress. The chaplain relates to all ranks within the Service. The role is both preventative and therapeutic in nature. The chaplain works in association with and is complementary to the family support team, such as medical officers, social workers, and psychologists. However, the chaplain’s function alone embraces the whole range of human experience, at the work place and in the home, in peace and in war.

Character Training. The Army chaplain shares a functional responsibility for, and is the specialist in, character training for Army personnel. Character training aims to develop personal characteristics and interpersonal skills, which motivate responsible moral judgements and behaviour conducive to the common good of the Army and its members. All initial entry courses include elements of character training, while continuation programs comprise Character Guidance Courses, Character Development Courses, Character Leadership Courses and Commanding Officer’s Hours. The chaplain generally plans, organises and administers the continuation programs.

Being involved in the complexity of life and death

A military chaplain may be asked to be involved in the guidance and counsel in many areas such as:
       morality – sexual, ethics and behaviour on and off base
       dealing with stress – addictive behaviours, etc.
       grief and loss
       transition in life– changes in lifestyle, control over their lives, structures,
       soldiers being reprimanded-
       loss of life – mates, family to illness
       isolation and relationships
       culture shock
       Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Chaplains are often involved in
       Memorial services, ANZAC, Remembrance Day.
       Ramp ceremonies
       Funerals (including  for unbelievers)
       Field service.
       Weekly services and seasonal services

Understanding the context

Being part of the military will involve learning a new rhythm of life and being under someone’s authority. Before you consider military chaplaincy you should consider how you will handle
       The possibility of ‘active’ duty on operations
       Being moved around different bases in Australia
       Diversity of belief , moral behaviours and actions
       The structured nature of service and direction
       Isolation from family/church community

Other resources:
       The Royal Australian Army Chaplains Department: http://www.army.gov.au/Who-we-are/Corps/The-Royal-Australian-Army-Chaplains-Department
       Defence Force Chaplains College (DFCC): http://www.defence.gov.au/adc/centres/dfcc/dfcc.html



Thursday, 14 August 2014

Women preaching in the Salvation Army

For nearly 1800 years Christians interpreted texts such as 1Timothy 2:11–14 to confirm women’s inferior nature and proneness to sin, thus concluding women were not suited for leadership positions or public ministry[1]. So when a devout and eloquent female evangelist Phoebe Palmer became popular in 1859, a nearby minister Reverend Arthur Rees[2] was so incensed that he wrote a pamphlet denouncing a woman as a preacher of the gospel[3]. This attack outraged Catherine Booth, co-founder of the Salvation Army, into writing a thirty-two page rebuttal, ‘Female Teaching’[4], systemically defending the equality of women in ministry. This essay will first examine the arguments Catherine presented in 'Female Teaching' in its defence, then analyse what role this understanding played in Salvation Army practice regarding the ministry of women.
 
Rees objected to female teaching on the grounds that it was unnatural and unscriptural[5]. Catherine argued that God gave woman a graceful form and attitude, winning manners, persuasive speech, and a finely-toned emotional nature, all of which are natural qualifications for public speaking[6]. To say female preaching is unnatural, Rees must prove either women do not possess this ability, or this ability unnaturalises her so that as soon as she steps on the platform, she loses the delicacy and grace of the female character and ceases to be a woman[7]. She wanted Rees to explain why women should be confined exclusively to the kitchen and the distaff any more than men to the field and workshop as God assigned men “to till the ground, and to dress it.” If Rees claims exemption on the ground of men possessing ability for intellectual pursuits, he must allow the same privilege for women, and that prior to the Fall at least, according to Genesis1:27-28, the human pair was equal in nature, position, and jurisdiction over the inferior animals[8].
 
Believing that her defence had to be justified biblically, the scriptures became the focal point of Catherine’s second general argument[9]. She argued that opposition to female ministry resulted from a mishandling of the biblical text[10]. Regarding 1Corinthians14:34-35, Catherine argued that Apostle Paul, the assumed writer of the text, could not be commanding women to remain completely silent, because he had just described, in chapter 11 of 1Corinthians, how women should pray and prophesy publicly[11]. Catherine’s assumption that the Bible could not contradict itself led her to conclude that 1Corinthians only precludes women from engaging in "imprudent or ignorant talking".[12]
 
Regarding 1Timothy2:11-14, Catherine put forward the views of commentators who suggested that this passage, when studied contextually and grammatically, was aimed at wives who usurped the authority of their husbands in the home[13]. She also weakened the argument linking women’s silence to the Fall by reminding Rees that man bore equal responsibility for introducing sin into the world, and “if, through her, sin first entered, through her also, without the concurrence of man, came deliverance.”[14] Catherine then put forward some positive biblical cases for female ministry[15].
 
Through quoting extensively from Phoebe Palmer’s book ‘Promise of the Father’, Catherine’s final argument was that success accompanied the efforts of female preachers[16]. If women bring people to Christ, then they are gifted by God and should be supported by their church[17].
 
However, women of the Victorian Era were constrained by a gender ideology that glorified sexual difference and equated certain tasks and spaces with the feminine[18]. Although Catherine’s writing encouraged women to assume a public role in ministry, it was not until 1860 that she found the courage to take on the role herself[19]. This initiated thirty years of preaching in Britain which, many agree, no man of her era exceeded in popularity or spiritual results, including her husband[20]. Furthermore, the Salvation Army expanded so rapidly and leaders were so urgently needed that its initial growth was the result of thousands of women recruited as military officers[21]. If convention had been allowed to stand in the way, its growth might well have been irremediably stunted.[22] When Annie Davis became the first women appointed to take charge of a mission station in 1875 there was opposition but she was so successful that the concept of equality became entrenched in the foundation deed[23].
 
Nevertheless, balancing scriptural and societal subservience to man as "head" with the concept of "equality of the sexes" has been the Army's greatest problem in following Catherine’s lead in female ministry[24]. In her letter to William Booth in April 1855, she stated she would not alter woman’s domestic position as God has told her to obey her husband, therefore she submits. But she cannot believe that inferiority was the grounds of it. This seemed to highlight that spiritual equality was separate from a husband’s rule in the household[25]. Despite Catherine’s impressive accomplishments, she rarely took the credit she deserved[26]. Murdoch[27] suggested that she was protecting the fragile ego of her husband. Also, in spite of Catherine’s insistence on equality in the Salvation Army's Orders and Regulations of 1886, the pay scale was not equitable[28]. Most of the officers believed the woman’s first duty was her home and children and it was not right for a woman to put public ministry and leadership ahead of the needs of her children[29]. This restricted women as male headship rarely sanctioned anything other than a modest public role for them in the life of the organisation[30]. Few married female officers were fortunate enough to receive their own appointments, and even fewer were given public duties that approached, met, or exceeded those of their husbands[31]. The ideal role of a female officer was one of service and submission rather than leadership and authority, and the average female Salvationist’s life involve service to other women, children and the suffering[32].
 
In summary, Catherine Booth presented three strong arguments for female preaching in that God gave females natural qualifications for public speaking, that it is supported scripturally, and named many examples of positive results from women preaching. The actual practice of the Salvation Army concerning the ministry of women was complicated. Without women, it would not have expanded so rapidly. Yet, most of those who supported female preaching did not challenge scriptural commands on wives’ submission to their husbands. Male headship and the Victorian gender identity stereotypes of female domesticity meant it was difficult for married women to put domestic duties ahead and still perform officer duties at the same time. This made the concept of equality of women in ministry difficult to implement in real practice.
 
 
Personal opinion on women balancing scriptural and societal subservience to man as "head" with the concept of "equality of the sexes":
 
 
 
I strongly disagree with the Victorian gender stereotypes. For example, I see sensuality vs sensibility or emotional vs rational as personality traits, not gender traits! Some people are suited for domestic duties, some people are not. What a person is suitable for depends on their personality, not their gender. Who does what needs to be worked out prior to marriage. This was exactly what Catherine Booth did as she expressed her thoughts in her letters to William Booth prior to their marriage. She was lucky that William allowed her to preach. And for a guy with ego problems to allow such a thing to happen in the Victorian era, he must have loved her like Christ loved the church and gave Himself up for her.
 
 
 
Looking at ‘The Valiant Wife’ in Proverbs 31: This provides an idealised view of what would constitute the writer’s (Solomon’s) perfect wife. It offers an intriguing glimpse of domestic responsibilities and expectations, although the woman does not merely run her household, but also apparently grows food herself and runs a profitable business selling clothes. She earns respect, moreover, for her wisdom, industry and piety.
 
 
 
Some women do have the capacity to achieve both domestic and career success, like ‘The Valiant Wife’, and like Catherine Booth. I think it’s better to aim high.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Bibliography:
 
Anderson, Cora. “Shall women preach: Principles and practices in the Salvation Army and in the Methodist Church in Ontario 1882-1900”, Conrad Grebel Review, 8 (1990): 275-288.
 
Booth, Catherine. Female Teaching, 1859. Accessed July 26, 2014. http://www.jesus.org.uk/christian-classics/catherine-booth
 
Eason, Andrew M. Women in God’s Army: gender and equality in the early Salvation Army, Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2003.
 
Gariepy, Henry. Christianity in action: the international history of the Salvation Army, Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2009.
 
Haddad, Mimi. “Egalitarian Pioneers: Betty Friedan or Catherine Booth?”, Priscilla Papers, 20 (2006): 53-59.
 
Murdoch, Norman H. “Female ministry in the thought and work of Catherine Booth”, Church History, 53 (1984): 348-362.
 
Murdoch, Norman H. “Wesleyan influence on William and Catherine Booth”, Wesleyan Theological Journal, 20 (1985): 97-103.
 
Rader, Paul A. and Rader, Kay F. “Lest We Lose Our Legacy: Officer Women in The Salvation Army”, Priscilla Papers, 22 (2008): 19-22.
 
Sandall, Robert. The history of the Salvation Army: Volume II 1878-1886, London: Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd, 1950.
 
 
 


[1] Mimi Haddad, “Egalitarian Pioneers: Betty Friedan or Catherine Booth?”, Priscilla Papers, 20 (2006): 53.
[2] Andrew M Eason, Women in God’s Army: gender and equality in the early Salvation Army, (Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2003), 103.
[3] Henry Gariepy, Christianity in action: the international history of the Salvation Army, (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2009), 34.
[4] Catherine Booth, Female Teaching, (1859), Accessed July 26, 2014, http://www.jesus.org.uk/christian-classics/catherine-booth
[5] Eason, Women in God’s Army, 103.
[6] Booth, Female Teaching, 3.
[7] Booth, Female Teaching, 4.
[8] Booth, Female Teaching, 5.
[9] Eason, Women in God’s Army, 104.
[10] Booth, Female Teaching, 31. The oppositions took isolated passages, separated from their explanatory connexions.
[11] Eason, Women in God’s Army, 105.
[12] Norman H Murdoch, “Female ministry in the thought and work of Catherine Booth”, Church History, 53 (1984): 353. Catherine took the Greek word, lalein (to speak), to mean "imprudent or ignorant talking," not to be confused with Paul's earlier recognition of woman's right to "prophesy".
[13] Eason, Women in God’s Army, 106.
[14] Booth, Female Teaching, 21.
[15] Booth, Female Teaching, 17-18. Examples of women described in the scriptures that prophesised and revealed God’s will to Israel include Deborah and Huldah, examples of women being classified as equal to men in their leadership roles include Miriam and Anna.
[16] Eason, Women in God’s Army, 107.
[17] Mimi Haddad, “Egalitarian Pioneers: Betty Friedan or Catherine Booth?”, Priscilla Papers, 20 (2006): 57.
[18] Eason, Women in God’s Army, 79.
[19] Gariepy, Christianity in action, 35-36. On Pentecost Sunday, 1860, a crowd of more than a thousand had gathered. Catherine said, “It seemed as if a voice said to me, ‘Now if you were to go and testify, you know I would bless it to your own soul as well as to the souls of the people’.” She preached her first sermon, “Be Filled with the Spirit”.
[20] Murdoch, “Female ministry”, 354.
[21] Murdoch, “Female ministry”, 355-356. April 1878: 16 of the 20 wives have already taken a great part in the public service. By the last Christian Mission Annual Conference in August 1878, seventeen of the forty-seven evangelists were women, as were 355 of the 1,086 lay speakers.
[22] Sandall, Robert. The history of the Salvation Army: Volume II 1878-1886, (London: Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd, 1950), 12. In September 1878, forty-one out of ninety-one officers on the field were women.
[23] Cora Anderson, “Shall women preach: Principles and practices in the Salvation Army and in the Methodist Church in Ontario 1882-1900”, Conrad Grebel Review, 8 (1990): 281.
[24] Murdoch, “Female ministry”, 359.
[25] Eason, Women in God’s Army, 113. In ‘Female Teaching’, she asserted that a woman had a right to preach and teach, “except when, as a wife, silence is imposed upon her by her own husband.
[26] Eason, Women in God’s Army, 110.
[27] Norman H Murdoch, “Wesleyan influence on William and Catherine Booth”, Wesleyan Theological Journal, 20 (1985): 98. She saw that he was a man of as many doubts and insecurities as he was a man of pride, and that his boasts were a veneer for his persistent anxieties.
[28] Murdoch, “Female ministry”, 358. In 1896 single women captains received fifteen shillings, single men eighteen shillings, and married couples twenty-seven shillings a week. Only since the 1950s have single men and women received equal pay.
[29] Eason, Women in God’s Army, 132.
[30] Eason, Women in God’s Army, 114.
[31] Eason, Women in God’s Army, 90.
[32] Eason, Women in God’s Army, 154.