Showing posts with label priest. Show all posts
Showing posts with label priest. Show all posts

Wednesday, 14 March 2018

Morling Tuesday Chapel: Technically correct but wrong effect





Speaker: Dr Edwina Murphy

Scripture: Malachi 2:1-11

Edwina has a love hate relationship with iPhone map apps. Great for taking you where you want to go, and you follow the voice. However, you will encounter trouble if it asks you to turn right on a road without traffic light at peak hours. Or you arrive at a virtual location but the location is not there. Directions are important, as to where to go and how to get there. That’s what this passage is doing.

1Peter 2:5. Whatever we are doing, God calls us, in our own situation, to be faithful witnesses.

Malachi 2 starts with a warning: God warns us to protect us. God’s judgments are in line with what we’ve done. It’s like the warning lights we got on our cars. God gives us warnings because he wants to give us life. The priests have dishonoured God, and God will dishonour them. When mothers scold children, eg. “I will leave you alone in the… if you don’t…” If the mother carries it out, it can be child abuse. The mother is more likely just threatening them. But if she keeps doing that the children will stop taking it seriously. God’s warning is not like this. God’s warning is very serious.

The priests are teaching what’s right but doing what’s wrong. The real danger for Morling graduates is probably not teaching the Scriptures wrong, ie. heresy. The danger is to be technically correct, but not be helpful at all: being theologically correct but with the wrong effect. If we are speaking about God’s amazing grace but leaving people with a generalised feeling of guilt and oppression, or a message on joy but leaving people depressed, then we’re getting it wrong. If our preaching and our lives do not lead to building people up in the Fruits of the Spirit, then there’s something wrong. We may have a conviction of sin, but then we confess the sin, and feel the freedom associated with that. Let us not just be people who speak about grace, but be people who are gracious. Sometimes we may take the good news of the gospel but give bad news to people.

How can we know, when we listen to teaching, that it’s leading us right or wrong? We should hone our instincts by being familiar with the scriptures first. Understand God’s word and let the Spirit guide us. Let us be people who live those things out.

Personal thoughts and reflections:

The message of “living what you preach” is a very common topic which I have heard many times. However, in this chapel, I truly sensed a warning for myself when I heard the part on “being theologically correct but with the wrong effect” and this prompted me to think about real life situations.

I suppose when people have a sense of elitism about their faith, it can sometimes be a pretty dangerous thing. Let’s imagine I am feeling pretty down and hopeless, perhaps even angry at God because of some really bad events in my life. Then a person comes along and starts talking nonstop about himself/herself, about how God has made him/her so joyful and filled with the power of the Holy Spirit, therefore all Christians should be joyful and powerful, or else there’s something seriously wrong with that Christian… As a listener, I’d imagine that instead of feeling “joyful and full of power”, I’d feel even more depressed and powerless. Or, if I am not a Christian, instead of receiving the gospel as “good news”, I’d be thinking, “So this person is telling me that all Christians are full of joy and power? Then I can’t be one because I can’t imagine myself meeting that standard. It’s a religion for the elites and I’m not good enough.” Or “So here is this salesperson telling me how this “product” works so well on him/her. Well, I am not him/her! This person does not even seem to understand my situation and keeps talking about irrelevant stuff. How can he/she assume that this product will also work on me?”

It’s easy to make other people stumble, and most of the time we don’t mean it. In fact, if I had caused someone to stumble, that person wouldn’t exactly come to me and say, “you caused me to stumble”. It’s more likely that the person will just distance himself/herself from me and not say anything (unless he/she is a very close friend). Gotta pray that I don’t become a stumbling block for others, but be more empathetic and compassionate in my approach to people.


Friday, 10 February 2017

Threefold office of Christ: prophet, priest, king

How useful is the framework of the ‘threefold office’ of Christ as prophet, priest and king for understanding his saving work?

Prophet: Revealing[1]
l   The main task of the prophet was to act as the mouthpiece of Yahweh, confronting his contemporaries with Yahweh’s just claims upon them, calling them to be faithful to the covenant (Luke 4:18 Jesus Rejected at Nazareth). Jesus did just that and more.[2]
l   Undoubtedly, Jesus did this when he came to do the will of the Father (Luke 22:42 Jesus Prays on the Mount of Olives), to reveal the Father (Matt. 11:27), and to speak the things of the Father (John 8:28).[3]
l   In the Gospels (Luke 4:18-21, 24), Christ’s preaching and sign-acts frequently echoed the ministry of the OT prophets, and on occasion he explicitly paralleled his ministry and reception with theirs.
l   Jesus clearly understood himself to be a prophet: “A prophet is not without honour except in his own town and in his own home” (Matthew 13:57).[4]
l   Jesus was a prophet was in itself a fulfilment of prophecy: “The Lord your God will raise up for you a prophet like me…” (Deuteronomy 18:15).[5]
Yet there is significant difference:
l   While prophets always claimed to be speaking in the name of a higher source than themselves, Jesus claimed his own teaching to be of greater weight than the Pharisees’. (Matthew 5:17-20, The Fulfillment of the Law).
l   Not just a prophet but the eschatological prophet of Isaiah 61.[6]
l   His message was the same as the Father’s. (John 5:17-27, The Authority of the Son).
l   Jesus had come from the very presence of God, “No one has ever seen God, but the one and only Son…” (John 1:18). Not just a prophet but a son.
l   Pre-existence: “before Abraham was born, I am!” (John 8:58).[7]
l   Jesus also proclaimed good news:[8] Jesus describes the kingdom of heaven in terms that make it good news. (Matthew 13).
Christ’s revealing work covers a wide span of time and forms:[9]
l   Christ’s revealing works began before his incarnation, as the Logos. (John 1:9).
l   His prophetic ministry during his stay on earth. Jesus is the highest of all the revelations of God. (Hebrews 1:1-3).
l   Future: A time is coming where Jesus will return. (1John 3:2).

Priest: Reconciling
l   Nowhere explicitly called ‘priest’ but does perform the ‘priestly’ function of intercession and the sacrificial ministry of offering his own life.
l   There are numerous instances of Jesus’s interceding for his disciples while he was here on earth. (John 17).[10]
l   Christ’s death on the cross was also seen in priestly terms (Hebrews 2:14-18).[11]
l   Presents himself in John 2:20 as the fulfilment and replacement of the temple
l   Note also the ‘contagious holiness’ of Jesus’ presence among the sinners and the unclean
l   Jesus the Great High Priest in the order of Melchizedek: Jesus as both the priest and the sacrifice, through whom we enter God’s presence. (Hebrews 4:14-5:10).[12]
l   As a priest, Jesus is our mediator between God and ourselves (1 Tim. 2:5).[13] Jesus as both the fulfilment and the end of the holiness system of the OT, and the one in whom we draw near to God; his death as the ultimate exclusion and rejection, suffered in our place so that we might be purified and made welcome.[14]

King: Ruling
l   A king is someone who has authority to rule and reign over a group of people.[15]
l   Many in Israel wanted a king who would help overthrow Roman rule. Jesus refused to comply with these wishes.[16] Note also the ways in which his mission and rule are distinguished from the expectations associated with Davidic messianism: he both fulfils and transcends that category.[17]
l   Yet he acknowledged to Pilate that he was indeed a king, but of a different sort (John 18:36-37).[18]
l   The Gospel picture Jesus as a king (Luke 19:28-40). Isaiah anticipated a future ruler who would sit on David’s throne (Isaiah 9:7). Jesus himself also said the Son of Man would sit on a glorious throne (Matthew 19:28).
l   There is a tendency to think Jesus’ rule as being almost exclusively in the future. But there is evidence that Christ is ruling today:
n   The natural universe obeys him: Through him all things were made. (John 1:3).
n   The church: He is the head of the body, the church. (Colossians 1:18).
n   Then there is the final step in his exaltation, where he returns in power, that his rule will be complete.
l   In the epistles:
n   Connected especially with his resurrection and humanity (1 Cor 15:12-28, The Resurrection of the Dead)
n   A rule in which we participate (Eph 1:19-23)
l   Note the explicit contrast and collision between divine rule and human empire[19]

The inter-relation between the offices:
A threat to the unity of soteriology?
l   Note the ‘separation of powers’ between priesthood, prophecy and kingship in ancient Israel: unlike some other nations in the ANE, Israel did not have priest-kings and Israel’s (true) prophets were not tame propagandists for the king of the day.
l   The doctrine of the ‘threefold office’ has the advantage of bringing together three important strands of the biblical tradition. It does, however, tend to break up the unity of soteriology, choosing three categories at the expense of others (e.g. shepherd, saviour and servant), and scarcely takes adequate account of the extent to which the OT categories are transformed through Christ: their fulfilment is also in an important respect their abolition. (George Newlands, ‘Soteriology’, in A New Dictionary of Christian Theology, ed. Alan Richardson, John Bowden, p. 547)[20]
l   Reasons for the hesitancy to use the term “office of Christ”: [21]
n   The tendency, particularly in Protestant scholasticism, to view the offices in sharp distinction or isolation from one another.
n   The idea of office has been taken in too formal a fashion.
n   Jesus was commissioned to a task. The dimensions of that task (prophetic, priestly, kingly) are biblical. In order to preserve a unified view of the work of Christ, Berkouwer has referred to the office (singular) of Christ.[22]
A threefold conjunction:
l   Though a king, he rules not by the sword but by his Word and spirit. He is a prophet, but his word is power and really happens. He is a priest but lives by dying, conquers by suffering, and is all-powerful by his love. He is always all these things in conjunction, never the one without the other: mighty in speech and action as a king and full of grace and truth in his royal rule. (Herman Bavinck, Reformed Dogmatics vol 3: Sin and Salvation in Christ, p. 368)[23]
l   Christ is prophet, priest and king simultaneously and continuously:
n   Christ’s prophetic office reveals him as both priest and king.
n   His priestly sacrifice reveals the love, grace and justice of God and so it is also prophetic.
n   His kingship provides the authority undergirding all he does in prophetic and priestly terms.[24]

The offices and us:
l   One mediator (1 Tim 2:5): For there is one God and one mediator between God and mankind, the man Christ Jesus.
l   A royal priesthood (1 Peter 2:9): A collective role for the whole people of God, in relation to the world
l   Eschatological kingship (Rom 8:17): Now but not yet; we share in his sonship as fellow-heirs, who suffer with him now and will reign with him in the coming age. But the coming age invades the present, and the power of the resurrection makes us more than conquerors even in the midst of suffering and weakness.
l   Prophetic witness (Rev 19:10): Note the finality of God’s revelation in his Son (Heb 1:1-2); but there is still a place for NT prophecy within the church (e.g. 1 Cor 14, 1 Thess 5) and speaking in the name of Christ to the world (Rev 19)
l   Worship outside the camp (Heb 13:10-16): there is still a ‘priestly’ role for the church outside the camp, going with Christ to where he is present in the world and acting/serving in his name.[25]
l   Driscoll summarises the office of Christ as follows: As prophet, Jesus preached and taught Scripture with authority. As priest, Jesus cares for people and deals with their sin compassionately.[26] As King, Jesus demonstrated his rule over creation through miracles while on earth, and today rules and reigns over his people through church leaders, principles and systems by the Holy Spirit and according to his Word.[27] He tries to apply this to church leadership today as a model and believe that the leadership teams are best served by a combination of gifts so that they are biblically solid (prophet), grace centred (priest), and actually get the job done (king).[28]
l   I think it is important to be aware that although Driscoll’s model may be of some use in ministry, Jesus and Christians cannot be force-fitted into neat categories. First we have already seen that Jesus is prophet, priest, and king simultaneously, and he is also shepherd, saviour and servant. We should not restrict Christian ministry into these neat little categories. After all, humans in our limitedness can never fully understand God, and so too with the power and work Holy Spirit, as “the wind blows wherever it pleases” (John 3:8).

References:

Chung, Miyon. “The Incarnation and Mission of Christ (Part 2).” Lecture Notes, Morling College, September 13, 2016.

Christian Apologetics & Research Ministry. “Jesus’ Three Offices: Prophet, Priest and King”. Accessed November 1, 2016. https://carm.org/prophet-priest-king

Driscoll, Mark. On Church Leadership. Wheaton: Crossway, 2008.

Erickson, Millard J. Christian Theology. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2013.

Letham, Robert. The Work of Christ. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 1993.



[1] Erickson, Christian Theology, 698.
[2] Letham, The Work of Christ, 21.
[3] “Jesus’ Three Offices: Prophet, Priest and King”
[4] Chung, “The Incarnation and Mission of Christ”
[5] Erickson, Christian Theology, 698.
[6] Chung, “The Incarnation and Mission of Christ”
[7] Erickson, Christian Theology, 698.
[8] Erickson, Christian Theology, 699.
[9] Erickson, Christian Theology, 699-700.
[10] Chung, “The Incarnation and Mission of Christ”
[11] Letham, The Work of Christ, 21.
[12] Chung, “The Incarnation and Mission of Christ”
[13] “Jesus’ Three Offices: Prophet, Priest and King”
[14] Chung, “The Incarnation and Mission of Christ”
[15] “Jesus’ Three Offices: Prophet, Priest and King”
[16] Erickson, Christian Theology, 701-702.
[17] Chung, “The Incarnation and Mission of Christ”
[18] Letham, The Work of Christ, 22.
[19] Chung, “The Incarnation and Mission of Christ”
[20] Chung, “The Incarnation and Mission of Christ”
[21] Erickson, Christian Theology, 697.
[22] Erickson, Christian Theology, 787.
[23] Chung, “The Incarnation and Mission of Christ”
[24] Letham, The Work of Christ, 24.
[25] Chung, “The Incarnation and Mission of Christ”
[26] Driscoll, On Church Leadership, 66.
[27] Driscoll, On Church Leadership, 66-67.
[28] Driscoll, On Church Leadership, 68.