Showing posts with label creation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label creation. Show all posts

Tuesday, 24 October 2017

Psalm 8: Creation hymn


This is an exegesis of Psalm8 where I will first translate the psalm from Hebrew to English, do a literary analysis, comments on key details and critical issues, and reflect theologically on the text.

Translation (Hebrew verse numbers):

V1: The director over the gittith. A psalm of[1] David.
V2: Yahweh our Lord, how majestic is your name on all the earth, that you set your splendour upon the heavens,
V3: from the mouth of babes and infants. You founded[2] strength on account of your foes[3], to stop the enemy and avenger.
V4: When I see your heavens, the works of your fingers, the moon and stars that you have established,
V5: What is man, that you remember him, a mortal that you attend to him?
V6: You make him a little lesser than God, and in honour and glory you crown him.
V7: You make him Lord over the works of your hand. You set everything under his feet.
V8: Flocks and cattle, all of them, and even the beasts of the land.
V9: Birds of the heavens and fishes of the seas, that pass through the path of the seas.
V10: Yahweh our Lord, how majestic is your name on all the earth!

Literary analysis:

It is not possible to specify the authorship with certainty because in V1, לְ mean it is something associated with David, ie. it’s psalm by David, for David, or about David. The גִּתִּית probably has links with Gath, a Philistine town. It might be reference to a particular type of local instrument, melody, or a religious festival.[4],[5] This is the only hymn in the Old Testament which is spoken directly to God throughout its composition.[6] The first word to come out of the psalmist is “Yahweh”.[7]

V2 have a variety of different translations. “You have set your glory above the heavens” (NRSV). “Your majesty is praised as high as the heavens” (REB). “I will adore your majesty above the heavens” (Dahood).[8] “Your splendour above the heavens is praised” (Mays).[9] The reason for these variations is because there may have been an incorrect word division of אֲשֶׁ֥ר תְּנָ֥ה.[10] Since I have chosen “majestic” for אַדִּיר,[11] I chose “splendour” for הוֹד.[12] There is the further question as to whether v2b is best taken with the first half of v2, or with v3.[13] Many commentators[14],[15],[16] think that v2b can be taken with v3, otherwise we might expect verse 2b to occur at the end of v10.[17]

In V3, babes and infants is a poetic parallel to enemy and avenger. “Enemies” symbolize human strength, whereby the enemies of God do not recognise the name of God. “Babes” symbolise human weakness and humility.[18] Those who interpret the verse as “from the mouth of babes and infants, you founded your strength” see a strange paradox: in the weak “babes and infants,” God lays the foundation of a strength which can defy His enemies.[19],[20] Even when we interpret the verse as “that you set your splendour upon the heavens, from the mouth of babes and infants”, we still see God using the weak to display His glory. There is unexpectedness in the ways God’s assign roles to the strong and the weak.[21] Young children are often the strongest witness of God as they often respond with awe and wonder to the world around them.[22] It is not human arrogance but childlike recognition of God’s name that asserts such power.[23]

In V4, the speaker changes from “our” in V2 to “we”.[24] We see the greatness of the God, who created the boundless heaven by his ‘fingers’.[25] “Heavens” and “moons and stars” are word pairs, with the former referring to the daytime sky, and the latter referring to the night sky.[26] When we gaze at the stars and moon, we often find ourselves catching our breath[27] and becoming aware of one’s own insignificance. The finite is confronted with the infinite, the transient with the eternal.[28] In V5, “What is man?... Nothing.”[29] We see more parallel word pairs here: mankind vs human being, mindful vs attend. אֱנוֹשׁ and אָדָם are used to refer to human frailty and mortality.[30] זכר has a sense of compassion and purpose, since “remembering” implies God’s movement toward the object of his memory. פקד (lit. ‘you attend to’) similarly implies His action as well as His concern.”[31] God first thinks (be mindful) then acts (attend).[32] We even see a rhyme: rhyme: כִּֽי־תִזְכְּרֶ֑נּוּ and כִּ֣י תִפְקְדֶֽנּוּ.

In V6-9, we see God’s role for mankind as “a little lesser than God”.[33] אֱלֹהִים can mean “God, gods, divine beings”. Some interpreters (LXX, Tg, Syr) are prompted by modesty and use “angels”.[34],[35] “A little lesser than God” seem to contradict V4-5, which emphasises on the distinction between God, the majestic creator, and us, his frail creatures. I would keep “a little lesser than God” (Jerome, Aq, Sym, Th) because V6 seem to allude to the “image of God” mentioned in Genesis 1:26[36], which affirms the human race as being made in the image and likeness of God[37], and are crowned to take up God’s sovereignty in the world[38]. In Hebrew, V6 is a chiasm: verb (diminished), noun (angels), noun (honour and glory), verb (make a crown).

Some take the meaning of מְעַט temporally, “for a little while”[39], which implies that humans are only in the special position for the short period before the fall. Goldingay[40] does not think this interpretation will work, because “human disobedience did not undo humanity’s authority any more than it eliminated the divine image from humanity” (Genesis 9:1-2, 6), and “what God intended humanity to be, God still intends humanity to be.” Though mankind is small and insignificant, God has appointed man the divine function of governing[41], to extend mastery over all creating things, examples being living creatures in v8-9. [42],[43],[44] In V10, we see an inclusion, where the poetry begins and ends in similar ways.

Key details and critical issues:

Structurally, V2-3 is an invocation to praise the majesty of God’s name and God’s glory. V4-9 describes the motivation behind this: God is to be praised because God is the is the majestic creator, and God cares about us. V4-5 describes mankind’s sense of insignificance. V6-9 describes God’s role for mankind, which is to make them rulers over God’s creation. V10 is the conclusion, where there is repeated praise of the majesty of God’s name. Directionally, we see a movement from earth to heaven (V2-3), and from the heavens (V4) back to earth (V5-9); from Yahweh (V2) to humanity (V3), and from humanity (V5-9) back to Yahweh (V10).[45] There is also a horizontal movement that moves outward from human society from V8-9, from domesticated animals outward until it ends in the sea, the place of chaos, which is least hospitable to human society.[46]

In terms of language, there are many royal terminologies: The first stanza celebrates God as the king of creation, with words of royal divine attributes such as אַדִּיר and עֹז.[47] A metaphor is “a picture that is painted in words.”[48] The metaphor about the heavens, moon and stars being the work of God’s fingers is a way of identifying these as mere objects rather than deities.[49] The second half of this psalm honours humans, who have been crowned with royal responsibility.[50] Verbs such as עטר and משׁל are all royal terms. Terms such as כָּבוֹד, הָדָר and the phrase שַׁ֣תָּה תַֽחַת־רַגְלָֽיו carry royal connotations. The metaphor about God crowning humanity is a way of illustrating the extension of royalty from God the creator king to humanity.[51]

In terms of genre, this is a hymn of praise, and can be defined more precisely as a psalm of creation, as there is a relationship between this psalm and Genesis1.[52] Hymns celebrate the glory and grace of God, rehearsing who He is and what He has done[53], and relating us and our world to Him.[54] Psalm8 is a unique piece, combining hymnic material, wisdom material and lament material. For example, there is a point of similarity between Ps8:5 and Job7:17. The theme of creation seemed to have developed most fulling during and after the Exile, so this psalm is commonly thought of as postexilic.[55]

Theological reflection:

The central theme of this psalm is our covenant with the God whose glory fills the earth.[56] We see God’s revelation in Nature.[57] God’s reign in the world extends beyond his covenant people to include the whole humanity.[58] The Old Testament faith is such as that of the psalmist frequently had to fight against the idea of reducing God to a national level.[59] This hymn is “an expression of the sovereignty theology that is a hallmark of the Psalter”.[60] While acknowledging “the finiteness of a human being, his unimportance and limits”[61], this psalm also addresses the paradox that God “chose the weak… to shame the strong… so that no one may boast before him” (ICor.1:27, 29).[62] In Matthew21:15-16, when the Pharisees confronted Jesus at the temple about the children shouting “Hosanna to the Son of David”, Jesus quoted Ps8:3.[63]

Another important theme is the purpose of human existence: “What is man?”[64] Despite the finiteness of humanity, God conferred dignity and value upon us[65] by giving us “dominion” over creation.[66] “Dominion involved a pattern of responsibility. Glory belonged to the ruler, but the ruling was to be for the benefit of the ruled.”[67] Furthermore, according to Deut.17:14-20, “the king was given authority and responsibility in equal measures”.[68] God has placed all things under our feet not so that we may walk over them, but that we might care for them.[69] Currently we are depleting the earth and its resources, and a new sense of stewardship needs to replace this human greed.[70] Humanity should use their power over creation in a way that “serves the purposes and practices of their own sovereign.”[71] We are to view the “civilising work of humanity as honour and glory conferred on it by God and, therefore, as cause and content for praise of God.”[72] Man’s dominion over nature is second place to his calling as servant and worshipper.[73]




Bibliography:

Craigie, Peter C. Psalms 1-50. Waco: Word Books, 1983.

Davidson, Robert. The Vitality of Worship: a commentary on the Book of Psalms. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998.

DeClaisse-Walford, Nancy, Rolf A. Jacobson, and Beth LaNeel Tanner. The Book of Psalms. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2014.

Goldingay, John. Psalms Volume 1: Psalms 1-41. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2006.

Jacobson, Rolf A. and Karl N. Jacobson. Invitation to the Psalms: A Reader’s Guide for Discovery and Engagement. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2013.

Kidner, Derek. Psalms 1-72. London: IVP, 1973.

Mays, James Luther. Psalms. Louisville: John Knox Press, 1994.

Weiser, Artur. The Psalms. London: SCM Press, 1962.






[1] לְ something associated with David, belonging to/of/by/concerning.
[2] John Goldingay, Psalms Volume 1: Psalms 1-41 (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2006), 156. “Founding” is a frequent image for God’s brining the world into being, which involves gaining control of dynamic forces that could work against God’s purpose to create a cosmos.
[3] צוֹרְרֶ֑יךָ “hostile towards you”=”foes”
[4] Nancy DeClaisse-Walford, Rolf A. Jacobson, and Beth LaNeel Tanner. The Book of Psalms (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2014), 121.
[5] Davidson, The Vitality of Worship, 37.
[6] James Luther Mays, Psalms (Louisville: John Knox Press, 1994), 65.
[7] DeClaisse-Walford, Jacobson, and Tanner, The Book of Psalms, 122.
[8] Davidson, The Vitality of Worship, 37.
[9] Mays, Psalms, 65-66.
[10] Craigie, Psalms 1-50, 105. אֲשֶׁ֥ר Usually followed by perfect or imperfect. It’s not the normal imperative either. It’s got paragogic heh. One interpretative option is the root is tanat: chant or sing. Craige suggest combining the letters, because an incorrect word division has crept in, and the verb root is sharat, and na is engergic, which means to serve or worship.
[11] John Goldingay, Psalms Volume 1: Psalms 1-41 (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2006), 155.
אַדִּיר is usually used “with the implication of mighty or powerful”.
[12] Goldingay, Psalms Volume 1, 155. הוֹד suggests “awesome power and authority”. “Splendour” chosen because “majesty” was already used for אַדִּיר.
[13] Davidson, The Vitality of Worship, 37.
[14] Mays, Psalms, 65-66.
[15] DeClaisse-Walford, Jacobson, and Tanner, The Book of Psalms, 121.
[16] Goldingay, Psalms Volume 1, 155.
[17] Davidson, The Vitality of Worship, 37.
[18] Craigie, Psalms 1-50, 107.
[19] Davidson, The Vitality of Worship, 38.
[20] Craigie, Psalms 1-50, 107.
[21] Kidner, Psalms 1-72, 66.
[22] Davidson, The Vitality of Worship, 38.
[23] Craigie, Psalms 1-50, 108.
[24] Goldingay, Psalms Volume 1, 158.
[25] Artur Weiser, The Psalms (London: SCM Press, 1962), 140, 142.
[26] Goldingay, Psalms Volume 1, 158.
[27] Davidson, The Vitality of Worship, 38.
[28] Weiser, The Psalms, 143.
[29] Craigie, Psalms 1-50, 108.
[30] Davidson, The Vitality of Worship, 39.
[31] Kidner, Psalms 1-72, 67.
[32] Goldingay, Psalms Volume 1, 158.
[33] Craigie, Psalms 1-50, 108.
[34] Davidson, The Vitality of Worship, 39.
[35] DeClaisse-Walford, Jacobson, and Tanner, The Book of Psalms, 122.
[36] Kidner, Psalms 1-72, 67.
[37] Davidson, The Vitality of Worship, 39.
[38] Goldingay, Psalms Volume 1, 159.
[39] Kidner, Psalms 1-72, 67.
[40] Goldingay, Psalms Volume 1, 161.
[41] Weiser, The Psalms, 144.
[42] Craigie, Psalms 1-50, 107.
[43] Craigie, Psalms 1-50, 108.
[44] Weiser, The Psalms, 145.
[45] Davidson, The Vitality of Worship, 37.
[46] DeClaisse-Walford, Jacobson, and Tanner, The Book of Psalms, 125-126.
[47] Goldingay, Psalms Volume 1, 157.
[48] Rolf A. Jacobson, and Karl N. Jacobson. Invitation to the Psalms: A Reader’s Guide for Discovery and Engagement (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2013), 120.
[49] DeClaisse-Walford, Jacobson, and Tanner, The Book of Psalms, 124.
[50] DeClaisse-Walford, Jacobson, and Tanner, The Book of Psalms, 124.
[51] DeClaisse-Walford, Jacobson, and Tanner, The Book of Psalms, 125.
[52] Robert Davidson, The Vitality of Worship: a commentary on the Book of Psalms (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998), 36.
[53] Derek Kidner, Psalms 1-72 (London: IVP, 1973), 65.
[54] Kidner, Psalms 1-72, 66.
[55] Craigie, Psalms 1-50, 106.
[56] Kidner, Psalms 1-72, 66.
[57] Artur Weiser, The Psalms (London: SCM Press, 1962), 140.
[58] Mays, Psalms, 69.
[59] Weiser, The Psalms, 141.
[60] Mays, Psalms, 66.
[61] Kidner, Psalms 1-72, 68.
[62] Weiser, The Psalms, 142.
[63] Craigie, Psalms 1-50, 109.
[64] DeClaisse-Walford, Jacobson, and Tanner, The Book of Psalms, 120.
[65] DeClaisse-Walford, Jacobson, and Tanner, The Book of Psalms, 124.
[66] Davidson, The Vitality of Worship, 39.
[67] Mays, Psalms, 69.
[68] DeClaisse-Walford, Jacobson, and Tanner, The Book of Psalms, 127.
[69] DeClaisse-Walford, Jacobson, and Tanner, The Book of Psalms, 127.
[70] Davidson, The Vitality of Worship, 40.
[71] Mays, Psalms, 69.
[72] Mays, Psalms, 69.
[73] Kidner, Psalms 1-72, 68.

Friday, 13 November 2015

Old Testament Ethics


Outline and discuss the leading themes in the Old Testament’s ethical teaching.

Creation
l   Creation is taken as a source of Christian moral principles.
n   In Genesis 1-2, everything was still in good order.
n   Natural law is a morality based on the nature of things or on the nature of people. God has made the world and us in it so that some things are good and right for us and other things are harmful and wrong. What is bad tends to harm us, while what is good helps us to flourish.
n   In the beginning is a perfect Garden of Eden where harmony reigned. The harmony between man and woman, man and nature, man and the animal creation, and within man himself all stemmed from a proper relationship to God.
n   Natural law is God’s law expressed in us and in the world around us.
l   Creation implies humanity’s derived existence and therefore its obligation to live faithfully to its creator.
l   The abundance of life and its fruitfulness in Genesis 1 implies that all creation is good and God loves life.
l   Creation implies that God is lord of all the earth, not just Israel.
l   Humans are made in the image of God. Humans are therefore different from the rest of the created order. Humans bear a resemblance to God like a child bearing a resemblance to their parents. The image of God includes the moral aspects of the image. We are to be morally responsible before God. This implies that humans are not free to live in any way he/she sees fit. Some have pointed to conscience as the mark of God’s image: the void of God within us that gives us an intuitive awareness of right and wrong. Clifford[1] points out, outside of our rejection of God the greatest sin of humanity is to treat others as nonpersons! In fact, the biblical sign that we are right with God is that we love our neighbour as ourselves (Luke 10:25-37)!

Sin
l   Genesis 6:6 shows the grief of God when humanity turns away.
l   The fall in Genesis 3 describes the disruption of relationships that occurred: between humanity and God, man and woman, creation itself (the cursed land and serpent), woman and child, man and environment and work and finally humanity’s own being in death.
l   It can be said that the whole OT story describes God’s actions consequent to sin.
l   The Fall spoils everything, so that it is no longer clear what the original natural law was, or the essential image of God in man. Our consciences are twisted, and creation ordinances are impossible to keep in a fallen world because of our fallen human nature.

Covenant
l   With the collapse of the original harmony between God and man, there is a loss of the immediate awareness of good and evil and of the ability to obey God’s commands.
l   God enters into covenants with Noah (Genesis 6-9), Abraham (Genesis 12), the people of Israel at Sinai (Exodus 19-31), and David (2 Samuel 7).
l   God promises a new covenant (Jeremiah 31:31) that is fulfilled in Jesus (Hebrews 8:1-13).
l   Covenant (Hebrew berit) occurs 290 times in the OT, most often in relationship to God’s dealings with his people.
l   God initiates all covenants with people, and unilaterally undertakes to do certain things for them.
l   In the Mosaic covenant particularly, certain obligations are laid upon the people as their dutiful response to God’s call. God is also committed in this covenant to care for his people. Another word, God promises to bless the people of Israel, if they will keep his commandments and honour him.
l   Covenant finds expression in law. The best known set of laws is the Ten Commandments.
l   Some have summed up the essence of law in shortened form expressed by the lawyer who tried to trap Jesus in the parable of the Good Samaritan: “love the Lord your God…. Your neighbour as yourself” Luke 10:27.
l   Law may be a curse rather than a blessing showing how far short we fall.

Community
l   God called a people (Israel) to bear his word, which implies the importance of human community.
l   Humanity is not constituted by individuals who voluntarily agree to associate for common goals, such as a football club.
l   God’s dealing with the corporate people of Israel bears witness to the intrinsically communal aspect of humanity.
l   Earth is constituted by families, not just individuals or nations. OT ethics are social, each person belonging to a web of relationships that support them and in which they function as responsible beings.

Worship
l   Temple worship was important in Israel’s life.
l   Blood sacrifices were God’s provision for Israel to express and maintain the covenant relationship (Leviticus 17:11). This cultic worship recognised moral failures and the need for forgiveness.
l   Three major festivals: Passover, Weeks, and Tabernacles. Highlights enslavement, redemption and freewill offering of wealth.
l   Festive days: Sabbath, New Moon, Day of Atonement. Highlights rest and work, and confession and cleansing from sin.
l   Sabbath and Jubilee Year: rested the land from work and released mortgaged property and Israel slaves.
l   Israel’s worship reveals no sharp distinction between ethics and religious beliefs and practices.
l   In concerning itself with right conduct it does not distinguish between right moral conduct and right religious conduct.

Wisdom
l   Proverbs, Job, Ecclesiastes and the Song of Solomon constitute the Wisdom literature, “laws from heaven for life on earth”.
l   This type of wisdom is practical and down to earth.
l   Wisdom literature offers moral guidance and was presumably the “textbook” for the instruction of the youth of the court.
l   The wise are those who fear the Lord (Proverbs 1:7).
l   Wisdom is moral skill (Proverbs 1:5) in areas of righteousness, justice, equity, shrewdness, knowledge and prudence.
l   Much proverbial wisdom is expressed in opposites. Perhaps the key distinction is between the wise and the fool. The wise fear God and hear their teachers. The fools refuse both.
l   Wisdom ethics is rooted in daily life. Eg. Trust in a faithless friend is like a bad tooth or lame foot (Proverbs 25:19).
l   Many Psalms contain wisdom elements.
l   Ecclesiastes confirms the modern philosophical statement: when man “kills off God”, then he also dies.

Prophecy
l   The prophets from Amos to Malachi contain, broadly, two elements.
n   Impending judgment due to Israel’s sin and the prophet’s call to repentance.
n   Future hope of Israel. Especially is Isaiah 61.
l   The aim of the prophets was to restore the true morality as taught in the law and implicit in the covenant relationship.
l   Deuteronomy 30:11-20 summarises two ways open to Israel: Obedience brings blessing whilst disobedience brings cursing and judgment.
l   God’s judgment and punishment were designed to bring restoration, repentance and hence forgiveness.

The Ten Commandments
l   Sinai covenant states that God will provide for and protect his people, whilst they are to obey him. (Exodus 20:1-17, Deuteronomy 5:6-21)
l   The commandments are Israel’s covenantal responses to God and her redeemer; they are the structural form of her place in the covenant.
l   The commandments deal with relationships: with God or with neighbour.
l   Whilst the commandments are given in negative form, this form of moral instruction allows a large place for freedom. Outside the prohibitions, freedom is recognised.
l   For Israel, law structured national social and moral life.
l   National law: purposes include prohibitive, corrective, protective, and educative.
l   The Ten Commandments was the heart of Israel’s national law as a theocratic state.
l   In a theocracy, sins are often also crimes. Whereas in Australia, lying under oath is both a sin and crime, whilst lying to your neighbour over the fence is only sin. For this reason, any attempt to arbitrarily apply the Ten Commandments to modern states is wrong.
l   The Ten Commandments reflect God’s character
n   The commandments fit life’s design: they affirm a stable and abiding order of life.
n   The commandments tell us all what God expects us to do: God gave specific, clear and definite commands.
n   The commandments tell us what we already know we should do: For example, “you shall not steal” should not come as a surprise to any Israelite or modern person. They match the law written on our hearts (Romans 2:14-16).
n   The commandments are the way of life in Christ.
l   Law expresses the lawgiver’s beliefs or characters. So the Law is a reflection of God’s character.

Resources:

Clifford, Ross and Philip Johnson. The Cross is Not Enough: Living as Witnesses to the Resurrection. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2012.

Cook, David. The Moral Maze: A Way of Exploring Christian Ethics. London: The Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1983.  



[1] Ross Clifford, and Philip Johnson. The Cross is Not Enough: Living as Witnesses to the Resurrection (Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2012), 58.